Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6Z76W6TPLL2N6HXIPO4JUFE3EBVSX4MS/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "FBA5DC7307FE43B3808A4CEAB852558D@Toshibalaptop",
    "message_id_hash": "6Z76W6TPLL2N6HXIPO4JUFE3EBVSX4MS",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/6Z76W6TPLL2N6HXIPO4JUFE3EBVSX4MS/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k8cxm (a) fuse.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Jim Leder",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  Stacked loops?",
    "date": "2008-11-09T17:29:01Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/YF44S54W5KFZE5N4OJJUWR5R2YPPLFWK/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": " This may be a dumb question, but has anyone had any experience or luck using stacked 432 and 144 loops? Seems they offer a little gain and a nice omni directional pattern. If they are high enough off the ground, some of the lesser lobes would point near straight up. I have used a 0 gain dual band loop (E-factor) with some success on the closer in passes of VO52, FO29 and AO7, but it has been not very effective with AO51. Of course, I know nothing would compare with a high gain,  parasitic array, but not all of us have the means nor the location to do that. Stacked loops seem like a good idea, but I've never seen anyone mention it.\n\nThanks ....\n\n     Jim Bob Buckeye \n            AKA\n  **** Jim Leder****\n    K8CXM since 1961\n IBM retiree since 1999\n  \nThere are 10 types of people in this world -- those who understand binary\nand those who don't.\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}