Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/76PDHE65LTOK3CKHAN7NFZJC4W247UYU/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "24D8F96797C9431088063E0AB38AE084@WA4SCA",
    "message_id_hash": "76PDHE65LTOK3CKHAN7NFZJC4W247UYU",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/MVVF25AYHXTJ5JYHQPFV52EIUQR5ZOWN/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "APBIDDLE (a) UNITED.NET",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Alan P. Biddle",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Best type of coax to use between preamps and antennas",
    "date": "2008-07-01T07:46:14Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MVVF25AYHXTJ5JYHQPFV52EIUQR5ZOWN/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Ron,\n\nThere are a variety of flexible, low loss cables.  Over a 10-15 foot length\nthe differences in loss would be inconsequential.  Probably the most\nimportant factor is that it has excellent shielding, and preferably double\nshielding, to prevent pickup between the RX and TX bands.  Over the years I\nhave used RG-213, Davis Bury-Flex, LMR-400UF, and probably AirCom around the\nrotators.  I have used the original \"water pipe\" 9913 only, but I suspect\nthe modern flexible version would be fine as well.  Even with heavy use back\nin the pacsat and HEO days, I have never had a failure of a cable, except\nfor one of my bad connector installations where I did not provide proper\nstrain relief.  \n\nAlan\nWA4SCA\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}