Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7CNZ7LWGIC5VBDVEP5UZWRFQHKRKHLRF/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAEGYLCt6jmCXE5zwQ9MUUNrg-RpXFygMiF+ZkRPjP_3jkb1ESg@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "7CNZ7LWGIC5VBDVEP5UZWRFQHKRKHLRF",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/H6TOHJMDLVGYOB5J5UAB4XK3XQFKXRJV/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "gabrielzeifman (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Gabriel Zeifman",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs",
    "date": "2019-05-03T21:11:25Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OL6MY4D4I5WUTEW2Q4BVE5YRB22DDENY/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Arrow II antenna. In your hand... Any yagi. In your hand... I operate\nportable in Southeast Alaska, which as far as weather is like Western\nWashington but colder, wetter, and in general more severe. And I use an\nArrow, in my hands, winter, summer, whatever...\n\n73,\nGabe\nAL6D/VE6NJH\n\n\nOn Fri, May 3, 2019 at 1:08 PM Devin L. Ganger via AMSAT-BB <\[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Resending this to the list, instead of just to Sean. Sorry, Sean!\n>\n> I have an Elk for my D72A and that works fine when the weather cooperates.\n> Note below where I say I *replaced* the Baofengs - they're no longer in\n> play, for anyone named David Swanson who cares to take a swipe at me for\n> those.\n>\n> For those times when it doesn't (I live in Western Washington, so that's\n> quite a bit) I'm building something to mount on top of the house to use\n> with my Yaesu 857D until I can afford a rotator + M2 LEO pack or something\n> similar. We just bought our house, have two kids in college, and are\n> actively trying to get out of debt within the next year, so just going and\n> buying a ton of expensive hardware is not in the budget at this time.\n> Otherwise I would be asking about towers. :)\n>\n> I understand that the eggbeaters have their flaws, but I've read claims\n> that the Eggbeater-II design (which is more Moxon-like from what I\n> understand) offers better gain at the horizon than either the pure\n> eggbeater or Moxon. Is this not the case?\n>\n>\n> --\n> Devin L. Ganger (WA7DLG)\n> email: [email protected]\n> web: Devin on Earth\n> cell: +1 425.239.2575\n>\n> > -----Original Message-----\n> > From: Ted Krempa <[email protected]>\n> > Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 1:56 PM\n> > To: Devin L. Ganger <[email protected]>; AMSAT BB <amsat-\n> > [email protected]>\n> > Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs\n> >\n> > Hi Devin, frankly the 'eggbeater' days have come and gone in the\n> efficiency\n> > dept.\n> >\n> > Attached is an article from QST on the Moxon turnstile, a much better\n> option.\n> > Better than that is an Elk on a 'rat shack rotor at 15-20 deg fixed el.\n> >\n> > If interested, I can send you my files direct on either\n> >\n> > 73, Ted\n> > K7TRK\n> >\n> > -----Original Message-----\n> > From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Devin\n> > L.\n> > Ganger via AMSAT-BB\n> > Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 1:19 PM\n> > To: [email protected]\n> > Subject: [amsat-bb] ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs\n> >\n> > Greetings, programs!\n> >\n> > I'm looking to work with my son (who will be studying to get his\n> Technician\n> > license later this month) on building a UHF/VHF pair of eggbeater\n> antennas.\n> > I've found a few papers online, but does anyone have a good reference to\n> a\n> > detailed design?\n> >\n> > Does the ARRL Antenna book latest edition have any significant coverage\n> of\n> > eggbeaters at all? I have an older version that has nothing.\n> >\n> > Also, most of the designs I see are for a single band. If you're\n> deploying a pair\n> > for satellite operations, do you simply attach them through a duplexer?\n> > I have a Diamond MX-72N that I picked up a while ago for using with dual\n> > Baofengs, but it's been sitting in my drawer since I picked up my\n> TH-D72A.\n> > It has a 1.6~150MHz lead and a 350~460MHz lead.\n> >\n> > Thanks in advance for any pointers you might have.\n> >\n> >\n> > --\n> > Devin L. Ganger (WA7DLG)\n> > email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>\n> > web: Devin on Earth<http://www.devinonearth.com/>\n> > cell: +1 425.239.2575\n> >\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n> Opinions\n> > expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the\n> official views\n> > of AMSAT-NA.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> > program!\n> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}