Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7D64LHYLLIZ52IFQKM4JATGOHS7M3RRZ/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "CAPovOwekjWZoBDeyVZMpdKSR96xaFJKRyv94i0SY7LySt9ZHRQ@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "7D64LHYLLIZ52IFQKM4JATGOHS7M3RRZ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NU4QTMIQIABVUXOSPY74SBXZHRZVZR6A/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kayakfishtx (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Clayton Coleman",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Official QSOs Protocol via ISS (was: Expectations",
    "date": "2015-01-03T16:01:01Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/M5DBGVWX6ICPKOEOCORPQES2TJBIV4BW/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I loosely go by the same standard as a voice contact on the satellites\nas you described it, Sean.\n\nIf someone sends a packet with CQ I respond.  I send a \"Hello\"\ngreeting with some information, typically my grid square, directed at\ntheir callsign.\n\nIf they respond to my callsign acknowledging and providing additional\ninformation, I usually consider it a contact.  I gave him something.\nHe gave me something.\n\nI received 18 different callsigns via the ISS yesterday on a single\npass.  I tried to respond to several of them, but never saw a\nresponse.  Only N5LUL (long time ISS digipeater user) was live at the\nkeyboard and receiving/decoding.\n\n73\nClayton\nW5PFG\n\nOn Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Sean K. <[email protected]> wrote:\n> Kelley, WØRK, asked the million-dollar question for us ISS newbies:\n> \"To achieve an \"official\" contact, what does one do? Do I just send \"Hi\n> JoAnne\" and you send \"Hi Kelley\" back and that's it?\"\n>\n> Is there an official protocol or approach? The meteor-scatter and EME community have had an official format for a \"good\" QSO for years, which has been made even more official with the introduction of the WSJT software, which has a pre-programmed message sequence that is followed to completion. It's not considered a good QSO until both parties have confirmed reception of the other's info.\n>\n> Even on the voice sats, you generally exchange grids and get a \"Roger\" or \"QSL, 73\" knowing that you have made a good QSO. I haven't seen such a standard on QSOs made through the ISS digi.\n>\n>  Sean Kutzko\n> Amateur Radio KX9X\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n",
    "attachments": []
}