Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7KPSVJYAKAUENGGOTANIWCAWQJOTUCTN/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "7KPSVJYAKAUENGGOTANIWCAWQJOTUCTN",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NYB47CDDLC4QR7CYLKPYIQC2URD4NJT3/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "vk3jed (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tony Langdon",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: 2 for the group.",
    "date": "2008-03-09T21:45:25Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NYB47CDDLC4QR7CYLKPYIQC2URD4NJT3/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 07:40 AM 3/10/2008, John Hackett wrote:\n\n>Is there ant reason why I can't transmit a modulated carrier (FM) on \n>the 145.900Mhz uplink of AO-16 and receive CW on the SSB/CW? \n>downlink of 437.026Mhz ??.\n\nIn theory it should work, but you'll gain little, because only one \nuser can access the uplink.  Only advantage would be to stations with \nRx setups not up to scratch for receiving SSB, that might resolve CW.\n\n\n>Question 2.\n>\n>I am 'TOTALLY' blocked by mountains re: the ISS and PCSAT  and do \n>*NOT* have 9600bps gear for AO-51 ... however, I can receive AO-16.\n>\n>Can I use the UPW - (PSK modulation) - program to transmit APRS data \n>on the uplink and will that be received on the USB downlink ?? ... \n>and be forwarded to the internet via an APRS station ??.\n\nAO-16 is running FM up/SSB down on a permanent basis.  It is not \nrunning any digital modes these days.\n\nI'm not familiar with the state of digital operations, as I have \nlittle interest in the current state of digital satellite operation, \nand also find the hardware requirements to be a pain, because that \nrequires a fixed (or at least one that you can't operate while \nwandering around) station, and I have traditionally operated \nportable/pedestrian mobile/movile on various forms of public transport.\n\nThere's a number of people on here who can advise the best route for \ndigital ops.\n\n73 de VK3JED\nhttp://vkradio.com\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}