Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7Q425VMKJLR5HWNCLJUW4PXXOEMQJPOS/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "7Q425VMKJLR5HWNCLJUW4PXXOEMQJPOS",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/JQNBDHKQ4H2ZASQWAGICSBOIGCCZEWOY/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w4as (a) bellsouth.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Sebastian",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs",
    "date": "2011-01-22T22:44:51Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VNSZ5N3E6ULTVJURQXOTZNTKGABEPUZL/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QZKMPUMP3G2N7JWONVQA7NHDTLV4TVSI/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Although I already have VUCC satellite (#200 wow!), for those that don't yet what happens when you have enough confirmed grids via both paper cards and LoTW?\n\nWill card checkers go to the trouble of looking at your LoTW account and compare them to the paper cards, or should the paper cards go to ARRL for credit towards VUCC?\n\n73 de Sebastian, W4AS\n\n\n\nOn Jan 22, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Jeff Yanko wrote:\n\n> Hi John and all,\n> \n>> From what I recall with the old VUCC application it was discouraged to send \n> cards to HQ and to use local card checkers for VUCC.  With the new \n> application it seems like they will accept cards at HQ for VUCC but there is \n> a cost.  However, it doesn't state what to do if you take them to a card \n> checker?  On Thursday, I had sent an e-mail to Bill Moore, head of the \n> awards division at ARRL HQ, and haven't receive a reply back as of Saturday \n> morning.  In any case, we'll find out sooner or later.\n> \n> \n> 73,\n> \n> Jeff  WB3JFS\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}