Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7UENH4RKFXDHOFGYULXV3DGQOVXECRSC/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "4901290.199391222357077969.JavaMail.servlet@perfora",
    "message_id_hash": "7UENH4RKFXDHOFGYULXV3DGQOVXECRSC",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/7UENH4RKFXDHOFGYULXV3DGQOVXECRSC/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "eric (a) christensenplace.us",
        "mailman_id": "568dec94534e4a5aa7ef764bcf8ca8d4",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/568dec94534e4a5aa7ef764bcf8ca8d4/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Eric H Christensen",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: FO-29",
    "date": "2008-09-25T15:37:57Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I'll have to agree with Tim.  I dusted off my arrow a few days ago and walked outside to work AO-51 and I haven't had any problems at all.  I have been consistently working three and four stations a pass using 5-watts or less and my arrow antenna.  I remember when it was quite difficult to get into 51 with the same setup.  Maybe people have gotten more polite or maybe it's just luck.\n\n73,\nEric W4OTN\n\n\n>For what it's worth, guys ... any day can be QRP day.\n>\n>I'll soon be applying for the AMSAT Achievement Award using confirmed contacts \n>that were all made while I was transmitting 50 milliwatts RF out from my Yaesu \n>VX-7R, on 2 AA Duracells - the same set of AA Duracells, actually. I ended up \n>making 51 contacts at 50 mW RF out, and another 3 at 300 mW RF out, from that \n>one set of Duracells. \n>\n>Only 4 of the 20 contacts I'll use for the Achievement Award came on AO-51's \n>QRP pair of 145.880 up and 435.300 down. The other 16 contacts included all \n>three Mode-J FM LEO satellites during operation on the standard V/U pairs. It \n>took me six days of operating to wear out the Duracells, and I ended up with \n>20 states, Ontario, Mexico and Venezuela worked. The highlight for me was \n>state No. 20, thanks to Mark, WA8SME - it was my first-ever contact (any mode, \n>any band) with W1AW. That was cool!\n>\n>So any time you'd like a QRP day, just reduce the output power and go for it!\n>\n>73 to all,\n>\n>Tim - N3TL\n>AMSAT Member No. 36820\n>Athens, Ga. - EM84ha\n>-------------- Original message from Ben Jackson <[email protected]>: \n>-------------- \n>\n>\n>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- \n>> Hash: SHA1 \n>> \n>> Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF wrote: \n>> > Remember the weekly QRP day on ALL the sats until a few years ago? \n>> \n>> I actually like the idea of a QRP day. When Drew started bringing the \n>> 2nd V/U transponder online last winter/early spring it was fun to have a \n>> (nearly) empty satellite to play on and see \"how low I could go\" to get \n>> in. (5W into a vertical) \n>> \n>> Now that I'm testing a more directional antenna, it would be fun to not \n>> have to deal with the 50W stations muscling through. \n>> \n>> \n>> - -- \n>> Ben Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA \n>> bbj innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/ \n>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- \n>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) \n>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org \n>> \n>> iQEVAwUBSNuglwQiWVsfSvVvAQIsYAgAhRjVWgNvET8NcTHhtM4bpJxY8iliWFaZ \n>> r/2UlyWyQsfuwpNBK0x6UvzKgORqwjtV/g12TuT31fTpDhahf+h5ogVGs0uzQxjM \n>> BYFhAUW10eol8bi5JFtlHN1PCV2wev3vy7frxbyAx5Z5d73S4TLZEUPbNa1dmZ9z \n>> q8R13i9nWRxISIDlm/35iCM0xCBuRgVtCi2CRR+BMk4Up/aMDmJU2p7TQyLjrB2r \n>> TuBHb/PMjs/PrDA2k2TnhQ+9Qjia+HraMxLNHtESa+pMCaO8vDZeKnlR3mNmA9q9 \n>> wm7HmUX/mB8BGe590LJWeN9Fo4gzllgp1dOUITxRIHMxIW5B25GTxA== \n>> =eGIs \n>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- \n>> _______________________________________________ \n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n>_______________________________________________\n>Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n",
    "attachments": []
}