Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7VUPA24MGFKJYOAS3U74YNVDEW5NPQYU/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "20321841.1295871948079.JavaMail.root@wmvirt2",
    "message_id_hash": "7VUPA24MGFKJYOAS3U74YNVDEW5NPQYU",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/7VUPA24MGFKJYOAS3U74YNVDEW5NPQYU/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "mlolmsted (a) fuse.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: VUCC costs",
    "date": "2011-01-24T12:25:47Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/G7PTL4A3RWC5S565BB7KZKC4L4UH5WAZ/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Nice explanation of the costs for VUCC in the Jeff Yanko blog. However, I did \nnot see what happens with LOTW submisions.  \n \nIf the cost of awards keep going up, maybe the ARRL should offer award insurance \nas well as equipment insurance.  Just a thought.  :>) \n \nMerle, AA4QE \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}