Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/A3N7TAWKS3E4Y3AZVWSZK3K355ERHLD4/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAJtf0TmrNcJ7QKFmWkPN891YmVEcVK7AUj83r+V+NwPtAyoWkw@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "A3N7TAWKS3E4Y3AZVWSZK3K355ERHLD4",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/22P32LE2G52H6CJ6NUONR2DZXRTYKX6H/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "mrtoburen7 (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "e85b2f29794044f6bc879e2831ce6468",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e85b2f29794044f6bc879e2831ce6468/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Marshall Toburen",
    "subject": "[AMSAT-BB] Re: Operating Practices",
    "date": "2022-02-12T17:51:27Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/22P32LE2G52H6CJ6NUONR2DZXRTYKX6H/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5C5ETSPVIC6OUUZXL64R47IA4RFRCTHU/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I'm happy to voluntarily comply with operating CW in the lower portion of\nthe pass band.  I much prefer CW over voice whether working HF or Sats.  My\nfrustration is that there is little CW operation on Sats!  At one point, I\nhad more cross mode contacts on Sats (me on CW talking with someone using\nSSB) than CW to CW contacts.  I wish more folks would operate CW on Sats.\nIn my opinion, it is much easier to make and keep a CW contact while\ncompensating for doppler.\n\n73,\n\nMarshall AA0FO\nEM29ne\n\nOn Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 8:40 AM Wes Baden <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> I second the recent posting regarding CW activity in satellite\n> bandpasses.  Absent compelling reasons otherwise (for example, that rare DX\n> entity operating CW high up), band management works much better when CW\n> stations operate in the lower half of bandpasses.  Along the same lines,\n> I'll say that, when operating CW, especially working weak stations, it can\n> be very frustrating to be QRM'd by one or more S9 SSB stations in the\n> bottom half of bandpasses.  This is particularly true when they're calling\n> CQ after CQ, either not hearing or ignoring CW signals nearby.\n>\n> At the risk of appearing grumpy (my apologies), there lately seems to be a\n> number of CW stations looking for their downlink signal by keeping RX on\n> one frequency, then tuning TX and simultaneously sending dits at high\n> speed.  When they are S9 they create quite a bit of QRM as well, to both\n> SSB and CW ops.  I understand, of course, the need to match RX and TX\n> freqs--I tune manually myself, without software that helps automatically.\n> But isn't the better procedure to briefly key down on one freq, away from\n> the center of the bandpass, and then tune your RX and find your downlink as\n> quickly as possible?  This minimizes QRMing others.  I've also found that\n> doing this regularly makes it possible to guess pretty accurately where TX\n> and RX freqs need to be.  For instance, on RS-44, when it comes over the\n> north to my QTH, I'm within 1-2 KHz of matching up TX and RX by setting\n> tuning at 145.960 MHz and 435.648 MHz respectively.\n>\n> All this said, I confess that I was a Mad Ditter myself when I first got\n> on satellites two years ago.  I received a couple of emails--always\n> friendly, always helpful--from old timers about the above.  This general\n> email is sent out in the same spirit.  Satellite operation is different\n> from HF, and there definitely is a learning curve involved.\n>\n> 73 from FN54,\n> Wes NA1ME\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> -----------------------------------------------------------\n>\n> Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Acceptable Use and Privacy Policies available at\n> https://www.amsat.org/about-amsat/\n>\n> View archives of this mailing list at\n> https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]\n> To unsubscribe send an email to amsat-bb-leave(a)amsat.org\n> Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at\n> https://mailman.amsat.org\n\n\n",
    "attachments": [
        {
            "email": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/A3N7TAWKS3E4Y3AZVWSZK3K355ERHLD4/?format=api",
            "counter": 2,
            "name": "attachment.html",
            "content_type": "text/html",
            "encoding": "utf-8",
            "size": 5065,
            "download": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/A3N7TAWKS3E4Y3AZVWSZK3K355ERHLD4/attachment/2/attachment.html"
        }
    ]
}