Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/A73USFHJDY4C5VPN37VAWKLMEGHJYPLQ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "A73USFHJDY4C5VPN37VAWKLMEGHJYPLQ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/A6NYWOSMI35WMVXXA4DOC24G6C4GLQI5/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kk0sd1 (a) att.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Gary Mayfield",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] FD sat contacts",
    "date": "2017-06-23T23:52:59Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/UIBOHQHB35XYWOYXMQHMSS6R75V3XHLM/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2J4LRDXNLUII6OCFMAPPDHOEVWCKJ5JV/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Jeff,\n      I for one agree. I don't like the single FM rule or the fact that working w1aw on FO-29 and working w1aw on AO-73 is a dupe in the ARRL rules.              I've thought put w1aw and k6kph on the FM birds with some serious punch and have them hand out contacts on the FM birds. And have them be the only contacts that count...Or drop the 100 point bonus eliminating a lot of folks without satellite experience.\n    Don't want to start a flame war just expressing my opinion.\n\n73,Joe kk0sd \n\n    On Thursday, June 22, 2017 7:20 PM, Jeff Griffin <[email protected]> wrote:\n \n\n HI Paul, yes I know the rules well after 20 years. What I’m talking about is a total restructure of the sat contact thing. I would like a way to make sat operations a contest, like the rest of the bands. I’m looking for ideas…\n\n \n\n73 Jeff kb2m\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFrom: Paul Stoetzer [mailto:[email protected]] \nSent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 8:03 PM\nTo: AMSAT-BB; Jeff Griffin\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] FD sat contacts\n\n \n\nThey are fine, though confusing about the meaning of contacting \"different satellites.\" Does that mean that \"satellite\" is a band and working a station on more than one satellite would be a dupe? I'm not sure. AMSAT rules allow you to work the same station on multiple satellites.\n\n \n\n73,\n\n \n\nPaul, N8HM\n\n \n\nOn Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 19:47 Jeff Griffin <[email protected]> wrote:\n\nDoes anyone have any comments on the current ARRL FD satellite contact\nrules?\n\n\n\n73 Jeff kb2m\n\n\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\nto all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\nare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\nto all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\nare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n   \n",
    "attachments": []
}