Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AF6BUWKMWCUBMDVZV2M7253FA2NYQYJU/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "AF6BUWKMWCUBMDVZV2M7253FA2NYQYJU",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IJKMP7DIND2L5CLKG2UTCDST5S5MKGRV/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ku4os (a) cfl.rr.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Lee McLamb",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: FW: ARLB013 ARRL aiding effort to mitigate\trepeaterinterference to military radars",
    "date": "2007-04-24T23:51:21Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5FZJW33XY7C7EHITCYK5HYNIJCLNZC4H/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On Tuesday 24 April 2007 13:20:24 Nate Duehr wrote:\n> Some more information from another Amateur -- he phrased it all better\n> than I can:\n>\n> \"First of all, let me point you to the FCC document (47 CFR 2.106\n> Footnote US7) that spells out the 50 watt limit and the map showing\n> the areas affected:\n>\n> http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/maps/us7/\n\nThank you for posting that link.  As a resident of Florida I know there are a \nlot of locals who are unaware of that limitation.  I'm sure the situation is \nsimilar in other parts of the country.\n\n> This particular map shows areas that are under this particular ruling.\n> Not all of these are PAVE-PAWS sites. There are three major PAVE-PAWS\n> sites in the US. One at Cape Cod at Otis AFB, One at Beale AFB in\n> California and one in Alaska. They are a part of the ITW/AA or\n> Integrated Attack Warning/ Attack Assessment system that is controlled\n> by NORAD at CMC ( Cheyenne Mtn.) now to be moved to Schreiver AFB.\n> These other areas on the map may or may not be part of the ITW/AA\n> system described here but have some strategic gear that may have the\n> potential for UHF radio interference.\"\n\nThere are multiple government systems operating in that band, not all of them \nmilitary.\n\n\n> My comments:\n>\n> The map is interesting.  For example, the ENTIRE state of Arizona is\n> under this rule.  Did you Arizona hams out there know this?  Same with\n> Florida.  Any repeaters higher than 50W in either place?  Any hams\n> using more than 50W to hit birds from either place?  Sure.\n\nThe 50w limit is transmitter power output. Which should be more than enough to \nwork any satellite given the resulting EIRP with even a modest gain antenna.\n\nThere is a provision where hams in the affected areas can operate with higher \npower by coordinating their use with the local government frequency \ncoordinator's offices.  I know of several systems here in Florida which are \nlegally operating at greater than 50w output after going through the process.  \nAt least here it is not really more involved than what they need to provide \nto the local repeater coordinating council anyway.  Same info, just provided \nto another group.\n\n73,\nLee-KU4OS\n",
    "attachments": []
}