Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AFXQHYSMZ5F5MJTRRBHF3RLRJAFGXKVZ/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "006701ca9854$2025bf60$7500a8c0@borb1882f7ebcf",
    "message_id_hash": "AFXQHYSMZ5F5MJTRRBHF3RLRJAFGXKVZ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/AFXQHYSMZ5F5MJTRRBHF3RLRJAFGXKVZ/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "bato (a) starjan.hu",
        "mailman_id": "d85edf2c95b74ba8b79e3a865cec8008",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/d85edf2c95b74ba8b79e3a865cec8008/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bato, Andras",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Doppler correction - HRD 5.0 compared to SatPC32",
    "date": "2010-01-18T15:37:21Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hello Jan PE0SAT, \n\nI have tried both software with my FT-847.\n\nBefore I state which is my favourite, I must let you know about my correspondence with the authors.\n\nSimon and Erich helped me a lot when I started to test their products, so I am really grateful to them.\n\nWhen I use SatPC32 it is just like I were on an HF band, no difference. HRD V5.0 seems to be a bit too complex as a whole.\n\nThat's why I prefer Sat32PC and I can recommend to everyone for satellite activity.\n\ngl de ha6nn\nAndras\n",
    "attachments": []
}