Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AIEEBIK473KMYYOPADQX6ZKCJBBEP5FN/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "AIEEBIK473KMYYOPADQX6ZKCJBBEP5FN",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/YXAHQKLELGPGIL6RLCNLQQHRFTQIZSQ6/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "aa1ye (a) amsat.org",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "John",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Wind Turbine Interference?",
    "date": "2007-11-05T06:26:40Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FL7P4RICI7JVWBKGDKXIP2IYYGTWPIBD/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GABJE3PI3R7253PCLJQ2G2SE5NI6IHMP/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 16:28 11/4/07 -0800, you wrote:\n>\n>>Wind Turbines are a threat to Homeland Defense. They can produce large Blind\n>>Spots on Radars - above, infront and behind them - so yes they can cause\n>>problems to RF signals.\n>>\n>>Effects of Windfarms on Radar\n>>http://www.southgatearc.org/news/october2005/windfarms_radar.htm\n>>\n>Trevor,\n>\n>That is some pretty good stuff for higher powered xmitters...But I \n>doubt there is any instrument sensitive enuff to measure the \n>reflection potential from any satellite we will ever launch, and the \n>\"shadow\" that it would cause on a LEO is in less than a \n>second...HEO's may take a little longer....\n>\n>This is conjecture based on my HS physics...I would appreciate \n>comments from any of the many engineering experts we have on here...\n>\n>            73, Dave [email protected]\n>\n\t\t??????????????????????????????????????????????\n\tWB6LLO,\n\n  1.\tI have to admit I do not understand your term \"reflection potential\nfrom any satellite\".\n\tI would greatly appreciate an explanation of this effect and how to\ncalculate its magnitude on a received satellite signal.\n\n  2.\tHow do you calculate the \"shadow time\" (of this QRM?) to be less than\na second?\n\n\t73s  de  AA1YE\n\nPS:\tChecking your QRZ entry and your bio reminds me that I learnt to fly\n\"Stringbags\" in WW2. But the war ended before we were deployed to a\ncarrier. I should have been older or declared a false age to join.\n\n\t\t\n",
    "attachments": []
}