Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AQPPBF574CL2VWKLQRC2BFKI6FU35ED7/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "AQPPBF574CL2VWKLQRC2BFKI6FU35ED7",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/KC7ZTCLOHGRBI3OAKRSI2UINWGS24AUV/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "lucleblanc6 (a) videotron.ca",
        "mailman_id": "9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Luc Leblanc VE2DWE",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Third Party questionnaire",
    "date": "2006-10-18T01:15:49Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KC7ZTCLOHGRBI3OAKRSI2UINWGS24AUV/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 17 Oct 2006 at 15:59, Ransom, Kenneth G. (JSC-OC)[B wrote:\n\n\n> \n> 1. Does your country permit third party traffic between stations within\n> your country?\n> \n> 2. Does your country permit third party traffic between your station and\n> a station outside your country?\n> \n> 2a. If so, which ones?\n> \n> 3. Does your country have a link to the regulation regarding third party\n> traffic (please provide)?\n\nIn Canada Why making simple things over complicated?\n\n6. Communications on behalf of Third Parties\n\nInternational third-party communication in case of emergencies or disaster relief is expressly \npermitted unless specifically prohibited by a foreign administration.\n\nAny foreign administration may permit its amateur stations to communicate on behalf of third \nparties without having to enter into any special arrangements with Canada.\n\nCanada does not prohibit international communications on behalf of third parties.\n\nWe have to assume the other station operator conducting a third parties QSO is fully aware of \nhis/her country restrictions regarding third parties traffic.\n\nJust to pointed out this peculiar rules section:\n\n3. Frequency Bands and Qualifications\nAn operator of an amateur station may operate within the frequency bands set out in the attached\nSchedules I, II and III in accordance with the operator´s qualifications identified for the \nspecified band.  \n\n\nAnd the schedules only mentioned \nFrequency Band Maximum bandwidth\nOperating provisions\nOperator qualifications\n\nThere is no sub band allocation or mode/modulation restriction. It's a free for all but our \nnational and provincial associations ask we respect the old modulation sub bands allocation...But \nit is only suggested to avoid interfering with our next neighbours and other DX country.\n\nCan i pointed out how silly theses call sign struggle on ISS can appears down here...but we respect \nthe right to be silly even in space... Ridicule is even present in space.\n\nWhy not choosing a neutral international space station call sign as ISS-1 easy, simple and mature \namateur operator will have to set aside their \"nationalism\"... But the hard part to find is \nmaturity... \n\nI don't know if they will have to use different toilet paper brand depending in which module they \nwill read their news papers... as we all know money have no odours!\n\n\"-\"\nThe medium is the message...The content is the audience...;)\n\nLuc Leblanc VE2DWE\nWAC basic,CW,Phone,Satellite\nSkype VE2DWE\nwww.qsl.net/ve2dwe \n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}