Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ARZN6G7MVGVDBUQQNV5OFUSNPNYLKUT2/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "ARZN6G7MVGVDBUQQNV5OFUSNPNYLKUT2",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/O5545565BMS3TZSV2AR4G5IIXP7UJ2KE/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "lucleblanc6 (a) videotron.ca",
        "mailman_id": "9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Luc Leblanc",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Symposium News Posted to the Web",
    "date": "2009-10-14T04:18:22Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EGCBCMX4AD4SPVKGPIKGZDSRMQPY4N3F/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WY5CUMFFYOR6TFVFLIMEGQRMSSE2NMHB/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 13 Oct 2009 at 18:42, Tim - N3TL wrote:\n\nDate sent:\tTue, 13 Oct 2009 18:42:15 -0700 (PDT)\nFrom:\tTim - N3TL <[email protected]>\nSubject:\tRe: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Symposium News Posted to the Web\nTo:\tLuc Leblanc <[email protected]>, [email protected]\nCopies to:\[email protected]\n\n> Hello Luc,\n> \n> I have some questions. \n> \n>  1- What is the logical direction, in your opinion?\n\nHelping our German's friends launching P3E\n\n>  2 - How much would that direction cost, in your opinion?\n\nA lot of $$$ who should better invest in achieving P3E rather than sending another FM single channel LEO repeater cube\n\n>  3 - How would you propose paying for that direction?\n> \nI never see a clear financial and funding projected structure in years since AO-40. On any project when the goals are set and the money \ntarget is clearly establish the hard part will be to regroup all the international AMSAT'S and all the potential funding sources: \ngovernment, spaces agencies, universities, amateur radio association eg: ARRL, RAC, RSGB ect (Some of them already contribute to P3E)\n\nThe funding solution will go by an international funding campaign and by a fixed minimal contribution per amateur who want's to have an \nHEO. I am member of a local marina and each new member should pay a one time Dredging Fee of 250$. The marina is open here from May 15 to \nOctober 4 about 5 months. I can used a satellite 12 months am i willing to pay 250$ a year YES and could be more if a sound international \nstructure with well defined planning and objectives can demonstrate a serious will towards the next HEO.\n\nThere is already a lot of dedicated peoples around the amateurs radio satellite business who are only making their own small things in \ntheir small backyard. Why not regrouping their energies and money towards \"ONLY ONE SINGLE\" big project? In the amateur satellite world we \ncalled that a HEO satellite as AO-40  and as AO-07 AO-10 AO-13 generation who where the first steps towards AO-40.\n\nJust to be clear my opinion is not against the collective effort and people works but against some of the objectives they carry. Volunteers \nmotivation should be the best interest of all not the few.\n\nFeel free to come back this is a very wide subject of discussion with many possible outcome.\n\n73 Tim\n\"-\"\n\n\nLuc Leblanc VE2DWE\nSkype VE2DWE\nwww.qsl.net/ve2dwe\nDSTAR urcall VE2DWE\nWAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE\n\n \n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}