Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ASSBYRU7DY5ZKMPLA73642Q34TS4UI32/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ASSBYRU7DY5ZKMPLA73642Q34TS4UI32/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "ASSBYRU7DY5ZKMPLA73642Q34TS4UI32",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/TJ4BNZ5CFMQBBQRJNY3F2FZWMCARZN2J/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "broberts (a) mta.ca",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Bruce Robertson",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite user \"communities\"",
    "date": "2007-12-14T00:16:14Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MM7Q3JKZ7VEXKZ3O3LPSI264NBHUYLJB/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Quoting Frank Brickle <[email protected]>:\n\n> On Dec 13, 2007 5:28 PM, MKM <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n> > Just listen to 80m at nite and this is what you will get with\n> > channelized P4 digital venue.\n> \n> This whole line of discussion is doing a wonderful job of turning the\n> reflector into an email version of the same. Congratulations.\n> \n> I myself happen to be one of the volunteer developers of the digital\n> software, and am in a state of continual astonishment at the sense of\n> self-righteous entitlement expressed by some of the commentators here.\n> What is the point of amateur satellites if not the advancement of the\n> radio art?\n> \n> If you ain't part of the solution, you *are* the problem.\n\nWithout getting into the personal aspects of this, I think it is important\nthat one point be made clear for those who haven't been closely following\nthe design of software defined transponders and the advanced digital\npackage. The former technology (abbreviated as 'SDX'), in its usual\nconfiguration, provides a linear transponder which, to the ground station,\nwill be functionally equivalent to the ones we use now.  It is easy to get\nconfused and think that SSB/CW, etc. will not work on this because it is\n'software defined'. I understand we'll have a chance to try this out in\nspace on Suitsat2; can't wait -- got a school class all lined up, too.\n\nIn contrast, the digital package will support various digital modes\nincluding a messaging system that will make much less demand on the ground\nstation from a radio standpoint.\n\nAround here, 80m facilitates some excellent conversations and some poor\nones. That's the nature of human communication, in my experience. I don't\nexpect Frank Bickle and others to solve *that* problem, too :-)\n\n73, Bruce\nVE9QRP\n",
    "attachments": []
}