Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ATRX4OOFEXE6EOGQR5HQ2VIAVP5UOPMG/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "ATRX4OOFEXE6EOGQR5HQ2VIAVP5UOPMG",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/6WKYVCFHWKTMVFBPJJFIT7MBE4TW3FT2/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n4zpt (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Tom Azlin N4ZPT",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: BeeSat at 4800 GMSK",
    "date": "2010-04-11T01:36:01Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/UXLFE5XSSCG5CTIU272OL3L3NH5HSPY4/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VT7DZDXGDC6GNIHHU3UVH6FEIG4Z66SU/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Nate,\n\nthe D-STAR protocol is only GMSK at 4800 bps and they selected a \ntime-bandwidth product of 0.5. 4,800 bps or 4k8 is perhaps not talked \nabout as that IS the standard for D-STAR. So the software there might be \nadaptable.  that is the reason I thought to suggest it.\n\nGood luck and 73, Tom n4zpt\n\n\n\nNathaniel S. Parsons wrote:\n> Hi Tom,\n> \n> My mind had indeed played a trick on me, and I remembered MFSK as MSK.\n> \n> As far as the DStar group goes, I don't see any mention of 4800 bps or 4k8\n> kbps on the public page, so if it's not the group's focus, I don't want to\n> have to rely on that solution.\n> \n> Thanks,\n> -Nate KC2SVI\n",
    "attachments": []
}