Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AWLFJOV24DKWLXEHPQORHRAGNHPCXDPA/
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AWLFJOV24DKWLXEHPQORHRAGNHPCXDPA/", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/", "message_id": "17328236.9113751215056048315.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost", "message_id_hash": "AWLFJOV24DKWLXEHPQORHRAGNHPCXDPA", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/AWLFJOV24DKWLXEHPQORHRAGNHPCXDPA/", "sender": { "address": "wrightjrjr (a) verizon.net", "mailman_id": null, "emails": null }, "sender_name": "Jim Wright", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Best type of coax to use ... in ... AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 3, Issue 326", "date": "2008-07-03T03:34:08Z", "parent": null, "children": [ "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IUEND6QH2NHHU574ORC53PCBXF3YFT2S/" ], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "\n Make sure you get the correct N connector. You may have to trim some \nstrands out of the center conductor if you get the wrong connector. I \nhad the problem with a local Ham store that had connectors for RG8/RG11. \nAmphenol makes one for 9913 specifically.\n73,\nJim\n\nOn Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:45 PM, hasan schiers wrote:\n\n> I use them all the time, and have not had to use \"trimming \n> dimensions\". It is very easy to see where to trim with these two piece \n> connectors, just put the cable end near the connector and it's pretty \n> obvious where to cut things (much like a PL-259). I have found them to \n> be very acceptable N connectors and have done dozens of them without a \n> trimming chart.\n\n...hasan, N0AN\n\nHARVEY VORDENBAUM wrote:\n> Someone mentioned the 2-piece type N connector for 9913 type coax. \n> Does anyone have the trimming dimensions for those? I had to make up \n> my own and wonder how good they are.\n> 73, Harvey\n> K5HV\n>\n> ----- Original Message ----- From: \"joe cassano aka jmario\" \n> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> >\n> To: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> \n> <mailto:[email protected]> >\n> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 12:38 PM\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Best type of coax to use ... in ... AMSAT-BB \n> Digest, Vol 3, Issue 326\n>\n>\n> Installing a classic clamp type N connector like the Amphenol 82-202\n> (UG-21D/U) on flexible coax with a real copper center conductor\n> (RG-8,RG-213) is both easier and has a much higher probability of\n> success than installing the common PL-259. You only have to make one\n> easily accessible solder connection.\n>\n> Take a look at\n> http://www.amphenolrf.com/products/assemblyInstructions/280.pdf \n> <http://www.amphenolrf.com/products/assemblyInstructions/280.pdf> \n> <http://www.amphenolrf.com/products/assemblyInstructions/280.pdf> to \n> see\n> what is involved in attaching classic clamp style N connector.\n>\n> You also might want to read the reviews listed here:\n> http://www.eham.net/reviews/products/7 \n> <http://www.eham.net/reviews/products/7> \n> <http://www.eham.net/reviews/products/7> before you make any purchase\n> decisions.\n>\n>\n> Regards,\n> JoeC - K3FMA\n>\n> \n>> ------------------------------\n>>\n>> Message: 12\n>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:49:00 -0500\n>> From: Ronald Nutter <[email protected] \n>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> >\n>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Best type of coax to use between preamps and\n>> antennas\n>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> \n>> <mailto:[email protected]> Message-ID: \n>> <[email protected] \n>> <mailto:[email protected]> \n>> <mailto:[email protected]> >\n>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed\n>>\n>> After problems I had on Field Day in trying to operate the \n>> satellites, I\n>> am looking to upgrade the coax I use between the preamps and the\n>> antennas. I am using 9913FX from the IC-910H and the preamps. I had\n>> been using RG Mini 8/U for the connection between the preamps and\n>> antennas. Should I also use 9913FX between the preamps and the\n>> antennas? The run between the radio and the preamp is 50 ft. The \n>> run\n>> from the preamp to the antennas is about 10 - 15 ft depending on \n>> where I\n>> set the antennas up. I am concerned about how flexible the 9913FX \n>> would\n>> be in terms of the antennas rotating back and forth. I was planning \n>> on\n>> ordering the cables pre-made from CableXperts since working with N\n>> connectors isnt my strong point and dont want to worry about my\n>> soldering and having a good connection on both ends of the cable.\n>>\n>> Any suggestions appreciated.\n>>\n>> Thanks,\n>> Ron\n>> KA4KYI\n>>\n>>\n>> \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. <mailto:[email protected]> \n> <mailto:[email protected]> Opinions expressed are those of the \n> author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n> <http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb> \n> <http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb> \n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. <mailto:[email protected]> \n> <mailto:[email protected]> Opinions expressed are those of the \n> author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n> <http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb> \n> <http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb> \n> ------------------------------------------------------------------------\n>\n>\n> No virus found in this incoming message.\n> Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.134 / Virus Database: 270.4.3/1529 - \n> Release Date: 7/1/2008 7:23 PM\n> \n\n>\n> ------------------------------\n>\n>\nNo virus found in this outgoing message.\nChecked by AVG.\nVersion: 8.0.134 / Virus Database: 270.4.3/1529 - Release Date: 7/1/2008 \n7:23 PM\n\n>\n> ------------------------------\n>\n> _______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. <mailto:[email protected]> \n<mailto:[email protected]> Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \nprogram!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n<http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb> \n<http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>\n", "attachments": [] }