Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AXPZTDZFUVQ5METKZQM7LO4V2ZQG7YJG/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "1959718089.480430.1288890502608.JavaMail.root@sz0126a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net",
    "message_id_hash": "AXPZTDZFUVQ5METKZQM7LO4V2ZQG7YJG",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/AXPZTDZFUVQ5METKZQM7LO4V2ZQG7YJG/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w7lrd (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bob- W7LRD",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Oldest working orbiting satellite? Todays quiz!",
    "date": "2010-11-04T17:08:22Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\n\nI  know this has been kick around before, however, w ith all the satellites up there in various stages of functionality is it not possible any of them could be \"configured\" for our use?  \n\n73 Bob W7LRD \n\nSeattle \n\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Chris Bloy\" <[email protected]> \nTo: [email protected] \nSent: Thursday, November 4, 2010 9:43:20 AM \nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Oldest working orbiting satellite? Todays quiz! \n\nHi Robert, \n\n  \n\n>> Non-working Amateur Satellite still in-orbit? (AO-13?) \n>> \n>Oscar III...then Oscar V...Oscar V has no chance of coming back to life, it \nwas battery powered.. III?  I dont think that there were enough solar cells \non it to actually power the bird, but I could be >wrong.  I do listen for \nit. \n\n> \n\nAh, that's interesting.. I did have a quick check on Space Track via date \nsearch, but didn't know that III was still there! \n\n\n\n\n>> Non-working commercial sat? Vanguard-1? \n>Yes. Technically the rocket body is older but that is the oldest in orbit \n\n> \n\nTechnically the R/B isn't a satellite?? \n\n\n\n\n>> Working commercial satellite still in orbit? \n>Probably one of the 1960's ERG's...but I can check. \n> \n\nFrom \nhttp://www.satellites.co.uk/forums/tech-head-news-items/140262-oldest-workin \ng-comms-sat.html : (Thanks John LA2QAA) \n\n  \n\n\"The record holder appears to be ATS-3 still nominally operational after an \namazing 41 years!\" \n\n  \n\nThat's a record we want AO-7 to break isn't it? \n\n  \n\nThanks, \n\nChris \n\nProject OSCAR UK \n\n  \n\nwww.projectoscar.co.uk - www.projectoscar.eu \n\n  \n\n_______________________________________________ \nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n",
    "attachments": []
}