Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AZDECAL3C6ZMN6PFODQ5VKBPH3BM7VNV/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAFingdMPAYuWe7=djyKEE4tTvR1u4-DL+g73WztGOLgnvNYEGg@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "AZDECAL3C6ZMN6PFODQ5VKBPH3BM7VNV",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/P3TKK2YSXPZAJNQ3KKPRX6FDV5YF55J3/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ke5gdb (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "bede4222a4a345e8971f03953d4f34b0",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/bede4222a4a345e8971f03953d4f34b0/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Andrew Koenig",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] EO-80 FM Transponder Tested",
    "date": "2015-06-17T14:43:56Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NUBEQNT2KFV4JOYXNVJVA4WBOWDQ2C6T/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2RSL6MDOEL7DN3HYLORBXJDJL5PKSQLX/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "*9dB (typo)\n\nOn Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Andrew Koenig <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Can you explain the 6dB advantage 2m has over 70cm? I've seen it here on\n> the amsat-bb, and in the mesh realm when comparing 2.4GHz and 5.8GHz WiFi\n> gear, but it still hasn't \"clicked.\"\n>\n> 73 de KE5GDB\n>\n> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Paul Stoetzer <[email protected]> wrote:\n>\n>> Nick,\n>>\n>> It should be even stronger than AO-27's 500 mW, AO-27 had a 70cm\n>> downlink, the EO-80 downlink is on 2 meters, so EO-80's signal should\n>> be up to 9 dB stronger than AO-27 (12 dB stronger if they run it at 1\n>> watt).\n>>\n>> 73,\n>>\n>> Paul, N8HM\n>>\n>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Nicholas Mahr <[email protected]>\n>> wrote:\n>> > Thats very good news, Hopefully the two get activated before field day?\n>> Im\n>> > most looking forward to EO-80, It should be like AO-27 with 500Mw or 1W.\n>> > Good to know both are working well and wish a long life to them.\n>> >\n>> > 73 KE8AKW\n>> > _______________________________________________\n>> > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n>> Opinions expressed\n>> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views\n>> of AMSAT-NA.\n>> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n>> program!\n>> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n>> Opinions expressed\n>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n>> AMSAT-NA.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>\n>\n>\n> --\n> Andrew Koenig\n>\n\n\n\n-- \nAndrew Koenig\n",
    "attachments": []
}