Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/B2EGNEEFJC5KJKLVAAEK5DGKQXATWXKV/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "B2EGNEEFJC5KJKLVAAEK5DGKQXATWXKV",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/TRHUKLHNEQN4XPUEU6ZKLAK7OSLLZGN3/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "aa5jg (a) yahoo.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "John Geiger",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Icom 910H vs Kenwood TS2000",
    "date": "2009-11-30T21:47:11Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FUBPUP33UQFOOJIVEMIVIWTGRDY5J762/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4LU3JAPMU27CACUCGJNNXSJYKPNR3CIO/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I have used a Cushcraft 13B2 (13 elements) on 2m and a Cushcraft 719B (19 elements) on 70cm on the satellites with no problem.  Didn't experience either as being too narrow beamwidth for sat use.\n\n73s John AA5JG\n\n--- On Mon, 11/30/09, wrb <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> From: wrb <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 910H vs Kenwood TS2000\n> To: [email protected]\n> Cc: [email protected]\n> Date: Monday, November 30, 2009, 2:11 PM\n> Your antenna plan is not bad, you\n> just to make sure that their pointing \n> (direction) are reasonably accurate. The larger the array,\n> the higher \n> the gain, the more narrow the beam width. The 11 element\n> array pointing \n> comment was just to be sure that that individual was\n> reasonably close to \n> the direction of the bird. Off pointed and he could be\n> experiencing the \n> problem he is seeing of not hearing the bird(s). If was\n> meant only as \n> another suggestion to look at.\n> \n> When I get my rotator fixed, I plan on putting the KLM two\n> meter 22 \n> element and 70 cm 40 element arrays back up. They worked\n> extremely well \n> on AO-7 and the HEOs that once circled the heavens.\n> \n> Reid, W4UPD\n> \n> \n> Tom wrote:\n> > Thanks for all of the great information. Since both\n> the TS2000 and IC910H\n> > have been around a while I believe that most of their\n> 'problems' have been\n> > at least discovered. So, in that respect, I'm leaning\n> away from the \"still\n> > to be debugged\" IC-9100. Also new rigs always are\n> priced high in the\n> > beginning of their life, as we all know. I know that\n> some of the ham dealers\n> > are offering \"Closeout\" prices on the 910H but I\n> didn't see much difference\n> > from previous pricing. \n> >\n> > Not to prolong this thread but Jerry's append (below)\n> brings up another\n> > question. How much antenna is \"too much\" for satellite\n> operation. Someone\n> > earlier mentioned that an 11 element yagi might have a\n> beam width too narrow\n> > to closely follow an LEO bird. I had planned on using\n> yagis with 13 elements\n> > on 2M and 18 els on 70cm. Is that a bad plan?\n> >\n> > Thanks again.\n> > Tom, KØTW\n> >\n> >   \n> >> Hi; I have owned the Ft-736 R and the Ft-847,\n> which I am using now.\n> >>            No matter\n> which rig you decide to buy the most important thing\n> >>           is\n> the antenna system.\n> >>\n> ------------------------------------------------------------------------\n> >>\n> >>\n> >>     \n> \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected].\n> Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur\n> satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n\n\n      \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}