Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/B6LZU5SGG7TUUJXRHDKUCKTQVW3XLG5G/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CANVAiQ_GF9LgSjt0nK65zxP24uw62UEttPQugVCFRWrViPkH+w@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "B6LZU5SGG7TUUJXRHDKUCKTQVW3XLG5G",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/B6LZU5SGG7TUUJXRHDKUCKTQVW3XLG5G/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "plaws0 (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Peter Laws",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Optimal QTH? (Re:  WAS-SAT 38 Years Later!",
    "date": "2016-06-07T20:57:16Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MCNDKHQDEFRL6STGYTEGWGOJYSZKZQNY/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5QURESSH2PAANOPZDIBFJ4CTYUY5EXQD/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:02 AM, R.T.Liddy <[email protected]> wrote:\n> SAT Operators,\n> I just received my WAS-Satellite Award #341 which ended upcovering 38 years of casual operating!\n\nCongrats!\n\nI am currently awaiting an Arrow from Arrow HQ and hope to start\nmaking contacts.  Not sure I can wait 38 years, however.  :-)\n\nI am in EM15, so shouldn't have much trouble even with LEOs, but has\nanyone calculated the \"optimal\" area for WAS QSOs?  I would expect\nit's pretty close to where I am but footprint is a factor, too.\nAnyone figured it out?\n\n\n\n\n-- \nPeter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!\n",
    "attachments": []
}