Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BFUUQEYIEXKZVQUHG7VI4YNVIMQ3ML5D/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "122020080117.22476.494C478F000B6287000057CC22243429029B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF049BCC02@att.net",
    "message_id_hash": "BFUUQEYIEXKZVQUHG7VI4YNVIMQ3ML5D",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/V43NAZPY62RAX5A3CKHTHF7OR7PCU5XP/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n3tl (a) bellsouth.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: ERP is not QRP apples and oranges",
    "date": "2008-12-20T01:17:03Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V43NAZPY62RAX5A3CKHTHF7OR7PCU5XP/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Amen, brother.\n\nSomething occurred to me earlier today in thinking about this ongoing discussion that includes a few different threads.\n\nGiven all the information I can find about the nominal transmitter powers of the satellites I have worked [AO-7, AO-16, AO-27 (currently inactive), AO-51, FO-29, SO-50 and VO-52], at least half of every satellite contact I've made has been QRP - the half coming this way from space. Most of mine - but not all - have been 2-way QRP.\n\n73, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all,\n\nTim - N3TL\n\n\n-------------- Original message from \"Jim Danehy\" <[email protected]>: -------------- \n\nERP is not QRP . . . . . . I never saw anything in FCC exams about QRP or \n> ERP but it has been a long time for me since I was last examined . . . \n> folks are confusing ERP and QRP . . . 5 watts out QRP driving an amp . . . get real . . . it is 5 watts out of the final stage feeding the antenna . . . the gain of the antenna does not have anything to do with QRP it has to do with ERP . . . one is apples and the other is oranges . . . the original issue arose out of someone feeling that folks using the AO 51 QRP channel were not using QRP . . . well I use 5 watts on the QRP channel but I only have fairly big yagis for satellites . . . If the goal is to have HT users with compromised antennas use the \"QRP\" channel then drop the QRP designation and ask the users to keep the power to 5 watts out from the final stage of the transmitter and then WHAT ? ? ? 5 watts many can compute but that is it . . . ERP is guess work by most . . \n> . that is my point . . . seems senseless to me but surprising the responses . . \n> . ERP is not QRP different concepts . . . apples and oranges . . . . \n> \n> Jim W9VNE \n> _______________________________________________ \n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n",
    "attachments": []
}