Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BLPDSPV5GHUOVGXDLB4NAJTZKSG6Q7RO/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "BLPDSPV5GHUOVGXDLB4NAJTZKSG6Q7RO",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/KIMUTKUC5457FQ6QOIBYBFQI4ZIELHCM/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "andres (a) msu.edu",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "STeve Andre'",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: OSCAR Acronym?",
    "date": "2011-11-13T03:34:10Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KIMUTKUC5457FQ6QOIBYBFQI4ZIELHCM/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 11/12/11 21:49, Clint Bradford wrote:\n>>> ... \"OSCAR\" stands for Orbital Satellite Carrying Amateur Radio ...\n> Why was it changed to \"OrbitING Satellite Carrying Amateur Radio?\"\n>\n> Did \"Orbital\" just sound too geeky for the masses?\n>\n> YES - the early citations from the 1960s had it as \"Orbital.\"\n>\n> WHO changed it to \"Orbiting\" ???\n>\nI don't think it was \"changed\" so much as someone used a\ndifferent word.  The words orbital and orbiting are very\nclose to each other.  So close that I'll bet most people would\nnot readily discern the difference.\n\nI learned it with orbital.  I'd probably use that if talking with\npeople, but hardly think that orbiting is bad.\n\nSo use either.  Orbital is better--or more historically accurate--\nbut not worth fights over (not implying you were thinking that).\n\n--STeve Andre'\nwb8wsf  en72\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}