Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BNSIV7T4OHIHDLWF6TXAJUFUWJUIIATE/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BNSIV7T4OHIHDLWF6TXAJUFUWJUIIATE/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "D8B99977BE294370A9426FAD8218FC4E@Ron8300PC", "message_id_hash": "BNSIV7T4OHIHDLWF6TXAJUFUWJUIIATE", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/BNSIV7T4OHIHDLWF6TXAJUFUWJUIIATE/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "w5rkn (a) w5rkn.com", "mailman_id": "ce8329f57b214c74b5462b39cfe26858", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/ce8329f57b214c74b5462b39cfe26858/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "Ronald G. Parsons", "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Uplink frequency of FM satellites", "date": "2016-08-09T16:50:44Z", "parent": null, "children": [ "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BTBU3W6Y4T6GJDHOUDDV72FWPZUOEMRV/?format=api" ], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "I had a little time to test just now before AO-85 got too busy. I was trying to change a lot of things but at the time of the test, uplink 435175 LHCP and LHCP on the downlink was the best. Of course a short time later RHCP was better. \"Tumbling Tumbleweeds\"\nRon W5RKN\n\nFrom: Ronald G. Parsons \nSent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 10:20 AM\nTo: Paul Stoetzer \nCc: AMSAT-BB \nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] Uplink frequency of FM satellites\n\nThanks Paul, \nI had heard that AO-85 was lower than the nominal, 435180, and did a short test yesterday.\n435180 gave acceptable audio and 435168 produced distorted and noisy audio.\nI’ll try 435172. The satellite is so busy it’s hard to get a good test in.\nRon W5RKN\nFrom: Paul Stoetzer \nSent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 4:08 AM\nTo: Ronald G. Parsons \nCc: AMSAT-BB \nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] Uplink frequency of FM satellites\n\nThere's nothing to suggest that 145.850 isn't it for SO-50. \n\nMeasurements after launch showed that the uplink for AO-85 is about 435.172 MHz.\n\n73,\n\nPaul, N8HM\n\nOn Monday, August 8, 2016, Ronald G. Parsons <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n Is there any good current data on the actual center uplink frequency at the satellite of the current crop of FM satellites such as SO-50 and AO-85?\n\n Ron W5RKN\n _______________________________________________\n Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\n are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\n Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n", "attachments": [] }