Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BQDEP6PDZT4J5KLN5XPGYA32TTGNIDUN/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "BQDEP6PDZT4J5KLN5XPGYA32TTGNIDUN",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/BQDEP6PDZT4J5KLN5XPGYA32TTGNIDUN/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "vk4tec (a) people.net.au",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Andrew Rich",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  QUAGI vs HELIX vs QUAD",
    "date": "2007-12-07T09:51:22Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3CTSVMYKSTHT46G2OUMVXEUW4GCGKWTW/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Today I built and compared two 70 cm antennae against various satellites.\n\nThe first antenna was a RHCP helix with 9 turns\n\nThe second antenna, a 8 element quagi. (vertically)\n\nThe clear winner was the helix.\n\nAnyone had similar experiences ?\n\nI remember way back about 10 years ago, i built a quad with a metal boom,\nand it picked up better side on. (not good)\n\nI have kept to an 8 element quad on 2meters, it is really good.\n\nI can key up a repeater some 150 km's away and i am in a ditch.\n\n\n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------------\nAndrew Rich VK4TEC\[email protected]\nhttp://www.tech-software.net\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}