Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BROVYRO4INCPQVRREELOSIABODYUQUAB/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "BROVYRO4INCPQVRREELOSIABODYUQUAB",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/4ZR52QNGT2Q4BDMHAKVQTDKB6NPUF3IR/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "dguimon1 (a) san.rr.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Dave Guimont",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Question about radios",
    "date": "2011-05-03T05:07:16Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4ZR52QNGT2Q4BDMHAKVQTDKB6NPUF3IR/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\n>\n>\n>\n>Can someone tell what is better for satellite work, the Kenwood \n>TS-2000X orthe Icom IC- 9100 ??\n\nAndrew, the \"better\" radio depends mostly on individual \npreferences...they all receive, and they all transmit...\n\nA few, maybe10 years ago, five of us from North Shores ARC in San \nDiego tested those two and as I remember a couple of \"yaysus\", and \nthe IC 900 was voted \"the best\"....\n\nI'm 89, poor hearing, and have been on the ham satellites since Oscar \n7, and have to admit that I favor Kenwoods....\n\n\n>We coax switched the radios so the comparison was instant, fades not \n>in the picture....\n\nHRO in San Diego let me take several radios home before I chose the \nIC910...perhaps you could do the same...\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n            73, Dave, WB6LLO\n                [email protected]\n\n                    Disagree: I learn....\n\n               Pulling for P3E... \n",
    "attachments": []
}