Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BTBU3W6Y4T6GJDHOUDDV72FWPZUOEMRV/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "BTBU3W6Y4T6GJDHOUDDV72FWPZUOEMRV",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/BNSIV7T4OHIHDLWF6TXAJUFUWJUIIATE/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "erich.eichmann (a) t-online.de",
        "mailman_id": "6679c7cde510458f8117afd8289f9948",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/6679c7cde510458f8117afd8289f9948/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Erich Eichmann",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Uplink frequency of FM satellites",
    "date": "2016-08-09T20:16:18Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BNSIV7T4OHIHDLWF6TXAJUFUWJUIIATE/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Ron,\nif you use SatPC32 you can use the \"Upl. Calibr.\" controls in menu CAT \nto correct the uplink frequency in steps of 10, 100 and 1000 Hz (while \nyou are transmitting) to check which uplink works best. The controls are \ndisabled with FM-Sats by default. To enable them also for FM sats click \nthe \"V\" control to \"V+\".\n\n73s, Erich, DK1TB\n\n\nAm 09.08.2016 um 18:50 schrieb Ronald G. Parsons:\n> I had a little time to test just now before AO-85 got too busy. I was trying to change a lot of things but at the time of the test, uplink 435175 LHCP and LHCP on the downlink was the best. Of course a short time later RHCP was better. \"Tumbling Tumbleweeds\"\n> Ron W5RKN\n>\n> From: Ronald G. Parsons\n> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 10:20 AM\n> To: Paul Stoetzer\n> Cc: AMSAT-BB\n> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Uplink frequency of FM satellites\n>\n> Thanks Paul,\n> I had heard that AO-85 was lower than the nominal, 435180, and did a short test yesterday.\n> 435180 gave acceptable audio and 435168 produced distorted and noisy audio.\n> I’ll try 435172. The satellite is so busy it’s hard to get a good test in.\n> Ron W5RKN\n> From: Paul Stoetzer\n> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 4:08 AM\n> To: Ronald G. Parsons\n> Cc: AMSAT-BB\n> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Uplink frequency of FM satellites\n>\n> There's nothing to suggest that 145.850 isn't it for SO-50.\n>\n> Measurements after launch showed that the uplink for AO-85 is about 435.172 MHz.\n>\n> 73,\n>\n> Paul, N8HM\n>\n> On Monday, August 8, 2016, Ronald G. Parsons<[email protected]>  wrote:\n>\n>    Is there any good current data on the actual center uplink frequency at the satellite of the current crop of FM satellites such as SO-50 and AO-85?\n>\n>    Ron W5RKN\n>    _______________________________________________\n>    Sent [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>    to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\n>    are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\n>    Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>    Subscription settings:http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings:http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}