Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BUDSEXQFWOKHKC3HRLTUAVN7U2MWBMT4/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "BUDSEXQFWOKHKC3HRLTUAVN7U2MWBMT4",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ZZW5DC6P2PDTS7TY4KVBWA55ZAI5AIY2/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "planophore (a) aei.ca",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Graham",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  LMR-240 and KSR-240 cable",
    "date": "2010-01-23T18:53:13Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZZW5DC6P2PDTS7TY4KVBWA55ZAI5AIY2/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I have been running across some references to a coaxial cable identified \nas KSR-240 and is described as a drop in replacement for LMR-240. The \nspecs for the two are pretty close but I was hoping that some on the \nlist may have some experience and comments on the KSR-240 versus LMR-240 \ncables.\n\ncheers, Graham  ve3ghm in Ottawa Canada\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}