Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BXUZJEEJFZEVFXKXNVNYDORIOBF5G3RN/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BXUZJEEJFZEVFXKXNVNYDORIOBF5G3RN/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "BXUZJEEJFZEVFXKXNVNYDORIOBF5G3RN",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/UXA2G3ZVQWA34KWWE642DPZMTCZN6AGT/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "gus (a) 8p6sm.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Gus",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Re;  Inclusion",
    "date": "2014-07-22T22:05:21Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/UXA2G3ZVQWA34KWWE642DPZMTCZN6AGT/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3AUYNSZLAPAKZO425WYZCTAHOTF7MOMR/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 07/22/2014 04:09 PM, Kevin M wrote:\n>> But as far as I'm concerned, it IS NOT the ultimate objective of a\n>> >satellite operator.  It is the BARE MINIMUM of satellite operation, and\n>> >there is no way I'm going to be satisfied with that for more than one or\n>> >two passes.\n> Fair opinion to have, you are entitled to it. However, stating it the way you do gives the impression (to me at least) that you can't see how anyone else would think any differently. When you say \"it is NOT the ultimate objective of a satellite operator\" I ask myself, 'How does he come to that conclusion?\"\nI think it goes without saying -- or should -- that any opinion I \nexpress on this forum is my own, and not fact by decree. Despite this, I \nexplicitly stated at least twice, that I was expressing my own personal \nopinion.  I do indeed recognize that others disagree with me and take \npleasure in minimalist operations, both on satellite and for that \nmatter, on HF. I specifically said:\n\n  > ... to those who enjoy it, more power to you!\n\nBut personally, I prefer the shack-potato (I love that term) approach, \nprobably because of how fondly I recall 6-8 hour passes, and the \nlengthy, antipodal ragchewing that could occur as a result.\n\nAs far as doing demos for the uneducated, broomstick waving is an \nexcellent introduction, highlighting the equipment simplicity and low \ncost.  I do personally think that the shack-potato option might also \nappeal to /some/ of the audience, so I hope the other end of the \noperations spectrum is mentioned at least briefly.\n\n-- \nGus 8P6SM\nThe Easternmost Isle\n",
    "attachments": []
}