Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BXZKXD3UKAIKSQZA53DSHOU3XAMZ5PNE/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "BXZKXD3UKAIKSQZA53DSHOU3XAMZ5PNE",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/LPIAC33KAY4WENLUGIFDAEYKLHNH7HNP/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "gary_mayfield (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "fe442cdc520e4857a9168b9182091295",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/fe442cdc520e4857a9168b9182091295/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: restating LOTW question",
    "date": "2011-01-21T04:38:08Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LPIAC33KAY4WENLUGIFDAEYKLHNH7HNP/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4KIIWENY35OPWEHI3KWWRTAGHEDSMB5H/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Patrick,\n\n     If your approach is wrong that makes two of us :-)  Last I checked no\nSO-67 -- I have no idea why!\n73,\nJoe kk0sd\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\nBehalf Of Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)\nSent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:21 PM\nTo: [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] restating LOTW question\n\nHi!\n\nThanks to those who have responded to my post when I made my\nfirst uploads to LOTW.  I had asked about what \"mode\" I should\nuse when uploading AO-16 QSOs, since that is a cross-mode \nsatellite (that's how I worked it - FM up, SSB down).  I have\nheard about what to set the BAND field, and N5JB's document\nmakes it pretty clear that you use the band you transmit on\nfor that field.  I am not uploading fields beyond the 7 \nnecessary to make a valid LOTW QSO record, so other fields\nlike FREQ and FREQ_RX don't matter.\n\nMy guess is that, if I follow the way the BAND field is \nhandled for satellite QSOs in LOTW, I would use the mode I\ntransmitted with for the MODE field.  In the case of AO-16,\nthat would be FM.  N5JB's document mentions an additional\nfield BAND_RX that some may use.  I have not seen any mention\nof a \"MODE_RX\" field, but I will go with \"MODE\" as the mode\nfrom my transmitter unless I get some authoritative information\nto the contrary.\n\nI will proceed to uploading CJ7EWK QSOs from November 2008,\nand try to get all of my July 2010 VA7EWK QSOs - including\nthose at the Canada/USA border - done tonight. Then the huge\ntask of the WD9EWK QSOs. \n\nBy the way, is SO-67 still a no-go in LOTW?\n\n73!\n\n\n\n\n\nPatrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\nhttp://www.wd9ewk.net/\n\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}