Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/C3BUUV3ZOMRZLTXSPFXWZFMQGJXZXHBE/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/C3BUUV3ZOMRZLTXSPFXWZFMQGJXZXHBE/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "C3BUUV3ZOMRZLTXSPFXWZFMQGJXZXHBE",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/C3BUUV3ZOMRZLTXSPFXWZFMQGJXZXHBE/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "vk3jed (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tony Langdon",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: GEO sats and Australia",
    "date": "2007-12-20T01:20:28Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 12:08 PM 12/20/2007, Dave Guimont wrote:\n\n\n>I really don't see much of a technical challenge with a geo, but if \n>that is the lie of the lie, so be it.\n\nYou still have to have the ERP to get into the bird, whatever mode it \nuses.  It's not going to be a \"HT special\".  In fact, I doubt FM \nwould be supported on it.  More likely would CW, SSB and digital \n(both voice and data) modes, since these are spectrally more efficient.\n\n\n>A cell phone has about the same degree of difficulty...\n\nYou've had to put up crossed Yagis to use your cell phone lately? \n;)  I certainly haven't. :D  However, not having to rotate my \nantennas will be a major advantage.  The cost and mechanical issues \nof rotators aren't feasible for me at this time.\n\n>And who gets the 1st third....or will all three be installed at the time??\n\nThat would be up to Intelsat I suspect....\n\n\n>I'd rather see one similar to AO7 or 8 with ssb/cw, and bandwidth to \n>enable many users, rather than the dumb FM voice (2 user) bird \n>AMSAT-NA spent all that money on...\n\nWell, I would like to see something higher than a LEO, CW/SSB (at \nleast when I tried on RS-12/13 a few years back) was very \nlonely.  Everything here is so far apart that altitude is needed to \nget out of our backyard, so to speak.  I'd also like to see Eagle up \ntoo (and work out some way of manually rotating the antennas. :)\n\n73 de VK3JED\nhttp://vkradio.com\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}