Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CBGHTL4UVV7G6KP3SNKV3UBFHTWJILEK/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "CBGHTL4UVV7G6KP3SNKV3UBFHTWJILEK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/QMH3MQPRHQYQB6DIPLY7HBJIET7HJ27H/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "davegoncalves (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "f97ac5d9d47c4e819df184cb1822b3a7",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/f97ac5d9d47c4e819df184cb1822b3a7/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "David Goncalves",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Courteous AO-51 Operation",
    "date": "2008-03-19T17:01:03Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/G7IIO2R6HQUYKIL5CH3NFIF7USSFHBLW/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Perhaps we can get this in the AMSAT Journal?\n\nDavid Goncalves\nW1EUJ\n\nOn 3/19/08, Ben Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:\n> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\n> Hash: SHA1\n>\n> Robert Turlington wrote:\n> | hi Ben\n> | have read your little piece on courteous AO51 Operation with interest\n> | and in general I toady agree with you, my only comment is why only AO51,\n> | because the other single channel satellites are almost as bad even the\n> | newly resurrected AO16 is a bit of a mad house a lot of the time here in\n> | Europe.\n> | I therefore suggest you rename your title as 'Courteous Single Channel\n> | Satellite Operation\n> |\n>\n> Hi Robert:\n>\n> John hit most of the points right on the head but I wanted to just toss\n> in my $0.02.\n>\n> I singled out AO-51 for few reasons: A. It's the one I have the most\n> experience on, B. It seems to be the most popular EasySat, and C. It's\n> the most straightforward to operate.\n>\n> SO-50, AO-27, and AO-16 all have their specific caveats in regard to\n> their on board timers, or their \"different\" operating mode. I have never\n> worked AO-27 or AO-16 and I didn't want to speak on a subject that I had\n> no experience with. SO-50 can actually violate \"Don't transmit unless\n> you can't hear it\" if the timer has expired, and I didn't want attempt\n> to make distinctions. Perhaps a SO-50 specific document might be in\n> order, but lets cross that bridge when we come to it.\n>\n> AO-51 was singled out due to it's popularity, and my comfort level\n> talking about it. However, you are right, and most, if not all, of the\n> document can be applied to other single channel satellites.\n>\n>                                ~Ben\n>\n> - --\n> Ben Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA\n> bbj <at> innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/\n> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)\n> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org\n>\n> iQEVAwUBR+E2cwQiWVsfSvVvAQLGjwf+I5Qt7bLWuCGWCPQfG6DE7GTJgRN6T8ZQ\n> 0k/tubXxjZ3rEwtxSGhuyZ40esxhUpOajTqtLwWX+04Jv9e2QXLdkoI5iRh6Jjc5\n> KbXRR9AYAdkF7ce2gZ9Rne/oTLGa3JO0Jt6BlNCFsNm0tef6ta72oRthlO4PWGpE\n> bNoIIE9hTbgkOpTSNgJhInJNBfO5hYQc71IwUiJNB9QigD5H6lZGnWaueDIk0Ahu\n> 53f/UzGyZE8oGSC03l02NKpUZSEzjA+N8bA32z4hRD2czU6EqbdjfwoNtryu2jGH\n> 5oDTQ7gfv3UxqSeSEYNfeSIlAxVvPvJKJqSuLRQtbxWWQn7baFwbNw==\n> =xGxp\n> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n\n-- \nDavid Goncalves\n",
    "attachments": []
}