Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CDIENHTWHNC6LKXL3UNDDPNMCMB6HJWI/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "CDIENHTWHNC6LKXL3UNDDPNMCMB6HJWI",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/CDIENHTWHNC6LKXL3UNDDPNMCMB6HJWI/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k9qho6762 (a) sbcglobal.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Polarization",
    "date": "2009-05-25T23:29:02Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "This is what I would recommend.\n \nI do not have polarization switching for either of my antennas.\n \nMy 11 turn helix on 435 MHz is RHCP\n \nMy 14 element KLM on 144 MHz is LHCP\n \nK9CIS has studied the polarizations of the uplink/downlink signals from AO-7, VO-52, and FO-29 and this seems to be the best selection.\n \nUsing his recommendation, I do remember switching my KLM from RH to LH because AO7's downlink was weak and switching did solve the problem.\n \nThe helix (polarization cannot be switched) was constructed for AO-40 (which was RH) and easily hears FO-29.\n \nThe optimum set-up is to be able to switch polarization, but you know how things go in the world of ham radio.\n \nAll the best.\n \nMike (K9QHO)\nAMSAT 33589\n \n \n",
    "attachments": []
}