Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CHBDFY3QJR6QJHOGIM72BQD42ESYQXFM/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "CHBDFY3QJR6QJHOGIM72BQD42ESYQXFM",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/QLVKD5RQHTV33QM2LTJTQX2XCYM3P6IN/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "top_gun_canada (a) yahoo.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "B J",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: SSB Operation on the Satellites",
    "date": "2011-06-10T04:36:17Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QLVKD5RQHTV33QM2LTJTQX2XCYM3P6IN/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "<snip>\n\n> So for the operator with a single\n> FT-817ND - understanding there will be a  \n> learning curve in regards to doppler, doing the \"Arrow\n> wave\" entertaining  \n> and/or frightening the neighbors, is AO-7 do-able or just\n> not a really  \n> good idea?\n> \n> Won't be ticked off if the answer is \"probably best not to\n> try\". Honest!  \n> :) I'm guessing it'll take a lot of programming memory\n> channels to stay on  \n> track?\n\n<snip>\n\nLast year, I tried using HO-68 on SSB with my FT-817ND and had mixed results.  Most of the time, other stations heard my signal but couldn't contact me because my downlink settings were too far off frequency.\n\nA few months ago, I bought a second-hand '847 and I've been practicing on VO-52 and AO-7 during passes which are fairly quiet and I'm less likely to interfere with other stations.\n\n73s\n\nBernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL\n\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}