Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CJAQVU547I2X7SJZES5S4LEDDV6PRYHJ/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "0BDA589B94EF4AB7BD5E9031C174F3BA@WA4SCA",
    "message_id_hash": "CJAQVU547I2X7SJZES5S4LEDDV6PRYHJ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ZKPBAFTSAMPMXAI3HD3E52MVTYDPQFWB/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "APBIDDLE (a) UNITED.NET",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Alan P. Biddle",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Doppler Tuning Convention Question",
    "date": "2010-06-01T07:57:48Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TIPHOAS6LJXAWSDH6PJ4JWJAKJ5QATEM/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Greg,\n\nA good compromise, and I certainly understand the desire to remain in the\nloop.  It allows the other operator to take advantage of greater automation\nor not, as suits them.\n\nAlan\nWA4SCA\n\n\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: Greg D. [mailto:[email protected]] \nSent: Monday, May 31, 2010 11:37 PM\nTo: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];\[email protected]\nSubject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: Doppler Tuning Convention Question\n\n\n\n> From: [email protected]\n> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]\n> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 21:42:09 -0400\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Doppler Tuning Convention Question\n> \n \n> \n> Alan, I have no doubt that you're right about the necessity for Doppler\n> control above Mode B satellites. Having always preferred the KISS approach\n> whenever possible, I suppose that's why I haven't been able to get myself\n> very excited for L- and S-band opportunities. I definitely enjoy the\n> benefits of computer control for Doppler. I just don't much care for\nhaving\n> no choice in using it (or not) to effectively work a satellite.\n> \n> 73 to all,\n> \n> Tim - N3TL\n> \n>  \n\nActually, I've been running 2.4 ghz manually since AO-40, and really haven't\nhad that much trouble.  Just keep spinning the dial.  Also, having an older\nrig (736r), I don't bother with computer control when on the linear birds.\nI do relax under full computer control for FM up through L-band, but there's\nstill something satisfying about manual tuning.\n\nGreg  KO6TH\n\n\n\n\n________________________________\n\nHotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your\ninbox. See how.\n<http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:\nWL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2> \n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}