Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CMER4FSLQDOYSSM6NN23PTSNKB62HTWK/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CMER4FSLQDOYSSM6NN23PTSNKB62HTWK/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "CMER4FSLQDOYSSM6NN23PTSNKB62HTWK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/AKXGQPT4BKMSVIS5W5TCXA4A5T64Z4Q7/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rmann (a) latencyzero.com",
        "mailman_id": "121de019d9f84629960e595cfec5bbe3",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/121de019d9f84629960e595cfec5bbe3/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Rick Mann",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Sat antenna fixed elevation -- how many degrees is\tthe best?",
    "date": "2008-02-19T18:34:27Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AKXGQPT4BKMSVIS5W5TCXA4A5T64Z4Q7/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nOn Feb 19, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Bill Dzurilla wrote:\n\n> I've seen people with fixed elevations of 25, 30, 35\n> degrees, any consensus on which is the best?  And how\n> well, if at all, does an antenna with a fixed\n> elevation of 30 degrees or so perform when the sat is\n> higher than 60 degrees?\n\n\nI had a contact a couple weeks ago with ISS. I used an Arrow II 2m  \nantenna mounted on a tripod, and my friend handled the pointing. While  \nI understand this wasn't strictly necessary, it was part of the fun.\n\nLater we discovered that the compass we used as a reference was  \nmagentically reversed, and we were pointing in completely the opposite  \ndirection from ISS. We were always able to hear ISS, but there were  \ntimes when ISS couldn't hear us. In the end, we probably shouldn't  \nhave bothered.\n\nFor more distant satellites, it probably makes more difference.\n\nAt least, now we finally know which way North is, generally, at our  \nlocation.\n\n-- \nRick\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}