Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CMPTVBQDZNTSREMFF3UYUOW2URID2NGZ/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CMPTVBQDZNTSREMFF3UYUOW2URID2NGZ/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "53A84E533FAE41F0816662CCD2CCCB83@MikeClone",
    "message_id_hash": "CMPTVBQDZNTSREMFF3UYUOW2URID2NGZ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/CMPTVBQDZNTSREMFF3UYUOW2URID2NGZ/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "mryan301 (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "bd66675a3fd2449d9a39d8aa56f5d5af",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/bd66675a3fd2449d9a39d8aa56f5d5af/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Mike Ryan",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]   Re: Elevation System",
    "date": "2011-01-18T18:35:41Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HV23W6KW4KOEQP6AVZVPOCCXYLE7K726/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I agree on TV rotors. Its an excellent inexpensive way to get elevation. The U100/110 is what I use as well and its well suited because you can put the boom right through the rotor. \n\nThere are some nice pictures of setups using these rotors on this sites:\nhttp://www.rotorservice.com/press3-alliance.htm        <- my setup imitates this one ...\nhttp://home.wavecable.com/~ko6th/\nhttp://users.wbsnet.org/n0yk/cushcraft.htm\nAnd there’s a QST article on this in the Dec 1998 issue \nYou can even build a controller for computer control but I’m currently rotating elevation and azimuth manually. \n\nMike WB1AAT\n----\nMessage: 7\nDate: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:52:35 -0800\nFrom: \"Greg D.\" <[email protected]>\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Elevation System\nTo: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>\nMessage-ID: <[email protected]>\nContent-Type: text/plain; charset=\"iso-8859-1\"\n\n\nHi Marco,\n\nIf you are looking to lash something together (instead of going with a purpose-built Elevation rotor), I and others have had success with Television-type rotors that have a through-hole for the mast.  Mounted on their side, they seem to perform very well.  Just keep things balanced, and protected from the weather and they should be happy.  \n\nSee:  http://home.wavecable.com/~ko6th/\n\nI used an Alliance U-110.  It has performed flawlessly for about 10 years now.\n\nGood luck,\n\nGreg  KO6TH\n\n\n> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:59:23 +0100\n> From: [email protected]\n> To: [email protected]\n> Subject: [amsat-bb]  Elevation System\n> \n> Hello,\n> \n> I'm Marco, IZ5IOW. I'm searching a good and cheap solution to build an *\n> elevation* system to set up an home satellite station. More specifically I'm\n> looking suggestions for the mechanical part... The loading of the antenna is\n> the follow: 15El UHF Yagi and 9 El VHF Yagi. The mechanical part should not\n> bear too much weight!\n> \n> Can anyone help me?\n> \n> Thank you all. Best 73s.\n> \n> Marco\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n       \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}