Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CNXS2FWL2MDOKHDPFHOAPVPJXAZEHKBE/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "CNXS2FWL2MDOKHDPFHOAPVPJXAZEHKBE",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/JUPTEMBW5SOUD7LGFMGDC35GNOXXRX5L/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ve9qrp (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "4d6061838db34aba9a1c4722addebfaf",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/4d6061838db34aba9a1c4722addebfaf/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bruce Robertson",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: ISS rptr",
    "date": "2008-02-09T01:12:59Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7FKXP3RFIWURGES67BS5FZ2FLWVGSLKG/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "What Luc says is correct, but there are band plans for Canadians:\n\nhttp://www.rac.ca/service/bandplan.htm\n\nOn Feb 6, 2008 4:54 PM, Luc Leblanc <[email protected]> wrote:\n> On 6 Feb 2008 at 12:35, Nate Duehr wrote:\n>\n>\n>\n> >Locally 145.79 is listed in our local band plan as \"Miscellaneous and\n> >Experimental Modes\" and it's not an appropriate place for a repeater\n> >here.  (Colorado, USA)\n>\n> >145.5-146.0 MHz is also NOT part of the U.S. repeater sub-band legally,\n> >but no idea what your rules in Canada are.  Searched the RAC website for\n> >a link to your regulations, and that was ... well, useless.\n>\n>\n> You find nothing because there is nothing to be found!!\n>\n> Canada deregulate Ham radio couple of years ago and there is no more band plan in the amateur radio bands in Canada. The National and\n> Quebec associations recommend to stick by the former sub allocations list that was mostly the same used in the US. They ask us to work on a\n> kind of gentlemen's agreement and as we are all gentlemen's we follow this advice but if one day i choose to put a repeater on 145.800mhz\n> nobody can force me to move away!!!\n>\n> If a choose to call CQ on 3.715Mhz in USB i can and the CW contester will have to \"behave\" accordingly...As you can see we are really\n> gentlemen's and i you can check on your side with some north eastern folks who are QRV on 80mtrs around 3.780mhz if they will confirm if\n> the same courtesy exist you will see that bottom line it is only a question of common sense, logic, and mutual respect.\n",
    "attachments": []
}