Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CYKNNFJT4E4WIZF6XLXSLWHBJHFUJV47/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "CYKNNFJT4E4WIZF6XLXSLWHBJHFUJV47",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/CYKNNFJT4E4WIZF6XLXSLWHBJHFUJV47/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "saguaroastro (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": "a4a1e7d14c254c03bd1ba487c7a01f6d",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/a4a1e7d14c254c03bd1ba487c7a01f6d/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Richard Tejera",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] EO-80",
    "date": "2017-03-04T06:28:37Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Thanks,  that does ring a bell. Too bad. \n\nRick Tejera K7TEJ\nSaguaro Astronomy Club\nwww.SaguaroAstro.org\nThunderbird Amateur Radio Club\nwww.w7tbc.org\n\nOn March 3, 2017, at 16:26, John Brier <[email protected]> wrote:\n\nEO-80 and EO-88 have similar names. Simply based on that, seeing one\r\nmight remind you of the other.\r\n\r\nPerhaps that wasn't it though...\r\n\r\nRegardless, the answer to the original question is on amsat.org\r\n\r\n\"Additionally, the satellite carries a AMSAT-F constructed repeater as\r\na return favor for support of the use of the amateur bands for the\r\nprimary QB50 mission. Unfortunately the primary transceiver was\r\ndamaged during a test of the repeater, and the repeater is power\r\nnegative. Further activation of the repeater is unlikely at this\r\ntime.\"\r\n\r\nhttp://www.amsat.org/?page_id=2948\r\n\r\n73, John Brier KG4AKV\r\n\r\nOn Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Richard Tejera <[email protected]> wrote:\r\n> I'm not getting what you mean? EO-80 is an FM transponder, EO-88 is a linear Transponder.\r\n>\r\n> Rick Tejera K7TEJ\r\n> Saguaro Astronomy Club\r\n> www.SaguaroAstro.org\r\n> Thunderbird Amateur Radio Club\r\n> www.w7tbc.org\r\n>\r\n> On March 3, 2017, at 16:12, John Brier <[email protected]> wrote:\r\n>\r\n> Maybe because Nayif-1 was just named EO-88?\r\n>\r\n> 73, John Brier KG4AKV\r\n>\r\n> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Richard Tejera <[email protected]> wrote:\r\n>> Funny, I was thinking the same thing this morning...\r\n>>\r\n>> Rick Tejera K7TEJ\r\n>> Saguaro Astronomy Club\r\n>> www.SaguaroAstro.org\r\n>> Thunderbird Amateur Radio Club\r\n>> www.w7tbc.org\r\n>>\r\n>> On March 3, 2017, at 11:01, Bill Attwood <[email protected]> wrote:\r\n>>\r\n>> Anybody know what's happening with EO-80? Wasn't the FM transponder\r\n>> supposed to be turned on full-time ages ago?\r\n>>\r\n>> Cheers,\r\n>> Bill\r\n>> VE6WK\r\n>> _______________________________________________\r\n>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\r\n>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\r\n>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\r\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\r\n>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\r\n>> _______________________________________________\r\n>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\r\n>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\r\n>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\r\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\r\n>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\r\n",
    "attachments": []
}