Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/D7E5QMFF5QKEMSXI42SPGSVXE5HU3UCC/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "D7E5QMFF5QKEMSXI42SPGSVXE5HU3UCC",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/UU3UZZKWMFGNHKKHA3FUHQ3UKT64IGLC/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "JamesDuffey (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "16d2718d7d4a47dca8f564d867aacfe2",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/16d2718d7d4a47dca8f564d867aacfe2/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "James Duffey",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: New ICOM VHF / UHF / SHF Radio",
    "date": "2009-08-23T14:46:03Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2JI6RHUGKUSGCDWKXRI2FNAYUM27MQ2Z/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GZC7D2SD5C2QK5C3NFUBILNJROYQEF4E/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nOn Aug 23, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Michael Baker wrote:\n\n>\n> \tIf that's the case, I think I would opt for a K3 with transverters\n> as that would be a better combination performance wise for the $$$\n> investment.\n\nWhile the raw performance of a K-3 is pretty impressive, it will cost  \na lot more to reproduce the new ICOM-9100, or even the current  \nTS-2000, with a K-3 and even then, you will not have the ability to do  \nfull duplex, which is required for serious satellite work. A modestly  \nequipped K-3 with 10W 2M output will set you back $2700 or more, you  \nneed to add a 100W 2M amplifier at about $400, a 432 MHz transverter  \nat $400, a 432 MHz amplifier at $400, a 75 Watt amp at $400, and a  \n1296 MHz transverter at $600, so you are close to $5k, still without  \nthe capability to do duplex for satellites.\n\nFor sheer performance you are better off with the K-3, but you pay for  \nit, and serious satellite use is precluded. - Duffey\n--\nKK6MC\nJames Duffey\nCedar Crest NM\n\n\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}