Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/D7TAOPQDRSWJ7K5NUW7TUVVEUE4RUQ6G/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "D7TAOPQDRSWJ7K5NUW7TUVVEUE4RUQ6G",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/D7TAOPQDRSWJ7K5NUW7TUVVEUE4RUQ6G/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "tjschuessler (a) verizon.net",
        "mailman_id": "e00b615eeb1940c790a22f139add6462",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e00b615eeb1940c790a22f139add6462/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tom Schuessler",
    "subject": "[AMSAT-BB] Re: FO-29 operation schedule for Sep. 2021",
    "date": "2021-08-25T15:20:03Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "The reason I askd that was the last time I tried to correlate passes in UTC over Japan  for the turn on, those times didn’t seem to line up right. Maybe I was looking at something wrong or I had bad keps loaded. \n\nSent from my iPhone\n\n> On Aug 25, 2021, at 10:08, [email protected] wrote:\n> \n> Since it says UTC, I would assume it's in UTC.\n> \n> Jim\n> K6CCC\n> \n> \n> \n> -----Original Message-----\n> From: \"Tom Schuessler via AMSAT-BB\" <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 07:48\n> To: \"amsat bb\" <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [AMSAT-BB] Re: FO-29 operation schedule for Sep. 2021\n> \n> Are the FO-29 times in local or UTC? Same question for FO 99 times?\n> \n> Sent from my iPhone\n> \n>> On Aug 25, 2021, at 02:23, JH3XCU <[email protected]> wrote:\n>> \n>> FO-29 operation schedule for Sep. 2021 (UTC)     <<<<<=========\n> \n> \n> \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}