Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DBUVMNRZ6NE33P2IBYA7FRJZHMJZQGOS/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DBUVMNRZ6NE33P2IBYA7FRJZHMJZQGOS/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "DBUVMNRZ6NE33P2IBYA7FRJZHMJZQGOS",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/5WIAXGUP4DV7FMI5H5DLQGYMD3C2MZZL/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w4as (a) bellsouth.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Sebastian",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: First SAt QSO",
    "date": "2008-11-23T15:41:24Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4PJZXE5BUWQT62T67KGCVBDETLVN5HPY/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NSXNIA5IVTGHSUAGFRDFDKRZN4AFYKSX/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Curt, I think I heard you in there, but there might have been too many  \nstations on there for me to call you.\n\nThe reason we talk fast is because of what someone already mentioned,  \nAO-51 goes by pretty quickly.  It's a very popular satellite, and the  \ntypical QSO is like a DX QSO on HF; with the exception that we  \nexchange the grid, for those working towards VUCC.\n\nMany of the AO-51 users realize that if they talk for a long time,  \nthat only cuts down the number of stations that can use the satellite  \nduring that pass.\n\nNow if you want to be able to talk a little longer, I suggest you use  \nSO-50, which is underutilized in my opinion.  SO-50 requires a PL tone  \nof 67.0, otherwise no one will hear you.  I suppose that might be one  \nreason why it is underutilized.  A lot of hams may not realize that,  \nand can't figure out why they can't hear themselves on the bird, and  \nthey give up.  If you are able to work AO-51, you can work SO-50, so  \nlong as your radio can do PL.\n\nI don't know the history of SO-50, but my guess is that it was decided  \nto use a PL tone, because of QRM from non-licensed hams using high  \npowered 'cordless phones' sold in some countries, and perhaps some  \nillegal users on 2 meters in other parts of the world.  Once you've  \nbeen on AO-51 for a few days, you will realize what I'm saying!\n\nNow if you really want to chew the rag, then you need to get on one of  \nthe SSB birds, such as FO-29 or VO-52; that is, if you have the proper  \nequipment.  There you will find that a pass can last a lot longer than  \nAO-51, and not be limited to one 'channel'.  But unfortunately as  \nwell, you will find those to be much more severely underutilized.\n\n73 de W4AS\nSebastian\n\nOn Nov 22, 2008, at 10:14 PM, Curt Nixon wrote:\n\n> Oh...very cool.\n>\n> Made my 2 very first ever sat QSO's on the 1830 pass of AO51.\n>\n> Simple radios, simple setup, simple(Cheap) Yagis.\n>\n> Man you guys talk fast!!!\n>\n> Curt\n> KU8L\n",
    "attachments": []
}