Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DEAX43QJSVHHZGIV3LJHCOBJHOQHP4KF/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "DEAX43QJSVHHZGIV3LJHCOBJHOQHP4KF",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/DEAX43QJSVHHZGIV3LJHCOBJHOQHP4KF/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "dxdx (a) optonline.net",
        "mailman_id": "deb66b1d0cee4858aa4f223457853f1c",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/deb66b1d0cee4858aa4f223457853f1c/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tony",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Pacsat Portables and Mobiles?",
    "date": "2017-10-28T20:28:25Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "All:\n\nI seem to recall a station or two working Pacsat mobile though either \nGO-32 or AO-51. I suspect that may have been difficult with a dual-band \nvertical, but not impossible.\n\nI understand the Kenwood TM-700 series have built-in TNC's with \nfull-duplex capability so they'd seem to work right out of the box.\n\nAny Pacsat operators that plan on trying Falconsat-3 with a mobile or \nportable setup?\n\nTony -K2MO\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}