Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DEED2FVC3AY3A7ASIFZOHMXP2GELOSUM/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "DEED2FVC3AY3A7ASIFZOHMXP2GELOSUM",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/WOPGXBTG6F6RDYTE2UHIIEOPQU76E4VA/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "bob (a) evoria.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Bob Stewart",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Longwindedness",
    "date": "2007-10-05T06:03:00Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DYTFL2FYFS5YIKLTY6ZCTRIUKIUGFORG/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5E27NCL5ACYUHYVS3K7C3S5MEYGOXFNN/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "--- Eric Fort <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Rather than getting an amp and engaging in a power battle (where you could\n> then be construed as CAUSING INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE to this guy) would it\n> not be better for AMSAT or one of the control stations to contact the\n> longwinded station in an official capacity letting him know that if he keeps\n> hogging the sat passes he will not be welcome.  \n\nYes, it would be better if AMSAT contacted the guy.  But, satellite resources\nare \ntoo precious for it to be even remotely reasonable to say \"I got here first so\nthe\nsatellite's mine for the entire pass and if you make a QSO you're interfering\".\n \nMaking contacts and ignoring these guys is not the same thing as whistling in \nthe mike (which I've heard on AO-51 and SO-50) or keying a dead carrier (which \nI've also heard) or anything else to deliberately interfere.  I've heard\nmultiple grid \nexchanges going on at the same time on the EZ-sats and it often works out\npretty \nwell.  It also reminds the few that there are others out there wanting to talk\nto someone, \ntoo, and they sometimes even take the hint.\n\nDo we have \"laws\" established for what an EZ-sat QSO is and how long it should\nlast?  Do we even want such laws?  Gentlemen's agreement's usually work out\npretty\nwell.  When they don't, then often notices from an OO are ignored and/or\nlaughed at,\n(Remember Dan and Jon?) and sometimes the first letter from the FCC is even\nbinned.  \nThat's when we get the pleasure of reading their callsigns and names on the\nboard of \nshame on ARRL (the fcc actions page).  By my book, being a gentleman means\ntrying \nto ensure that everyone gets to enjoy the pass - that \"everyone\" also just\nhappens to \ninclude me.  \"One and done\" works pretty good on a busy pass.\n\nBob - AE6RV\n",
    "attachments": []
}