Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DKPHVPXMANVPTUXLD5VXAFCGQQVAVLFF/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "DKPHVPXMANVPTUXLD5VXAFCGQQVAVLFF",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/7NJHVYPRJMW23ISRV2MNCDJWTRUCPBGV/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ve9qrp (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "4d6061838db34aba9a1c4722addebfaf",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/4d6061838db34aba9a1c4722addebfaf/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bruce Robertson",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Gulf Alpha antenna",
    "date": "2009-05-25T21:20:26Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7NJHVYPRJMW23ISRV2MNCDJWTRUCPBGV/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:18 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:\n> I   use  a  homebrew 2x5 on a 2 metre long boom and it works very well\n> with all current sats.\n> 73s, Alex VK5ALX\n>\n>>One of the other questions I have, \"2m Satellite 2x5 does it have enough\n>>gain to work the birds?\n>>\n>> 73,\n>> Norman.\n>\n>>73's Jan - PE0SAT\n\nI've been experimenting with extremely cheap antennas and mast-mounted\npreamps. In a relatively radio-quiet environment, I can use a wire\ndipole on 2m -- directly attached to the preamp -- and hear VO-52 from\nabout 5 degrees above the horizon. AO-7 is quite copyable, too.\n\nThe 2x5 of course has much better directionality, which will improve\ngain, and the circular polarization, which should reduce fading.\n\nMy point is two-fold. First, Alex, make the preamp your first\npurchase, not the beam. (Perhaps that's already your plan.) Second,\nyou might enjoy playing around with a very simple antenna with the\npreamp first, before adding the complexity of steering a rotor through\na pass. I'm certainly not advocating that people do without beams: I\nhave a set of home-brews that are about 6 elements, and I've done most\nof my work with them. I just think there is a cheaper, easier, first\nstep.\n\n73,\nBruce VE9QRP\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}