Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DO6WUCGCZRZL36WW7RPJWNGAH2CGBJBJ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "DO6WUCGCZRZL36WW7RPJWNGAH2CGBJBJ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/Z2BVNYV6FQW7CHOUQIR3Z6REDSXQGN2V/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "lucleblanc6 (a) videotron.ca",
        "mailman_id": "9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Luc Leblanc VE2DWE",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Question about tuning for doppler and SatPC32",
    "date": "2006-11-17T16:22:30Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Z2BVNYV6FQW7CHOUQIR3Z6REDSXQGN2V/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 17 Nov 2006 at 8:52, [email protected] wrote:\n\n> Hello all.\n> \n> I was on one of the early apsses of FO-29 this morning and was\n> having a QSO with another ham about which frequency to tune\n> for doppler. Both of us went LOS without comming to a mutual\n> agreement on this.\n> \n> This question has been asked before, I'm sure, but I thought\n> that I would ask it again.\n>\nExactly and at numerous time but there was no consensus or agreement on that \nmatter. Even if you tune both the uplink and the downlink automatically you \nended up with some manual correction at some point in the pass and you should \nhave your other party correcting both ways also and all the other users on the \ntransponder (read nearly impossible to achieve).\n\nWhat i found  here is to try to tune the downlink only don't touch  your uplink \n at all.   I know it's not perfect  but it is manageable and even if again we \ncan not expect all of us to use the same method it is a lesser problem then \ntrying to run after each other .     \n\nAgain it is what i found to be my best way to compensate for doppler shifting \nbut when you enter  into a QSO with a station who track both side it is a mess \nand i was rarely able to complete a QSO as i loose it on the transponder. Let \nsay there is some very bad  combination  .   \n\n \n\n\"-\"\nThe medium is the message...The content is the audience...;)\n\nLuc Leblanc VE2DWE\nWAC basic,CW,Phone,Satellite\nSkype VE2DWE\nwww.qsl.net/ve2dwe \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}