Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DOF477CHW5QO6IEDYUOIYAVBNZ4WWVUJ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "DOF477CHW5QO6IEDYUOIYAVBNZ4WWVUJ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/DOF477CHW5QO6IEDYUOIYAVBNZ4WWVUJ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "wb3jfs (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": "bdfc678d05af4f3f96c14d823fd3fbcf",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/bdfc678d05af4f3f96c14d823fd3fbcf/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Jeff Yanko",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] QSO Protocol",
    "date": "2016-10-02T22:11:03Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/XVBAUNMSLMOSAXQHBUXYG4YDADAO7EV7/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I would suspect that most people make QSO's via the birds to obtain \nawards, certificates, etc.  In a lot of cases, not all, grids are \nrequired.  That's why if you notice most QSL's printed up now have the \ngrid square listed along with possibly CQ and ITU zones.  10 years back, \nI've never recalled a QSL with the grid square listed.\n\n\n73,\n\nJeff WB3JFS\n\n\n\nOn 10/2/2016 2:51 PM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:\n> Grid square isn't required. Time certainly isn't needed in any \n> exchange (except for BARTG RTTY contest).\n>\n> 73,\n>\n> Paul, N8HM\n>\n> On Sunday, October 2, 2016, Jeff Yanko <[email protected] \n> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:\n>\n>     Callsign and grid square is all that is needed, plus the time,\n>     (UTC). Signal report on any birds isn't necessary.\n>\n>     BTW, signal reports aren't needed for HF QSO under WAS or DXCC.\n>\n>\n>     73,\n>\n>     Jeff  WB3JFS\n>\n>\n>     On 10/2/2016 1:37 PM, Joe wrote:\n>\n>         What is the standard for a minimal contact of what must be\n>         exchanged for a valid QSO?\n>\n>         Joe WB9SBD\n>\n>\n>     _______________________________________________\n>     Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>     to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n>     Opinions expressed\n>     are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official\n>     views of AMSAT-NA.\n>     Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n>     program!\n>     Subscription settings:\n>     http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>     <http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}