Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DRHOWUZRRZG2CEUSIM7EGH2LO7OJE4RL/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "DRHOWUZRRZG2CEUSIM7EGH2LO7OJE4RL",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NIXRGDSU3DRULEMDGRNZH4RAUOJMATIY/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "dguimon1 (a) san.rr.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Dave Guimont",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Keep It Simple Silly",
    "date": "2007-09-30T22:47:33Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/G6B53P4D26XVNHKDNWW246TFGZD423BC/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 02:27 PM 9/30/2007, you wrote:\n>Can I offer my viewpoint as a newcomer and a relative outsider?\n\nBob, there are no OUTSIDERS in amateur radio...I've been licensed for \n57 years, have operated the amateur satellites for 28 years, and have \noperated everyone launched since then, \nanalog/digital/am/cw/ssb/fm.  Have hundreds of QSL cards to prove it, \nand have made well over 7000  logged ssb/cw amateur satellite \ncontacts.    And I've been helped by dozens of other hams, since \nthen, and still need it once in awhile for things I've \nforgotten...I'm 85.  AO7 was my first one by the way, and I operated \nit then(1980) with wa5zib, Andy (he has a new callsign w5acm, I \nbelieve) and operated AO7 with him again on 21mar 04.....when it \nmiraculously came back to life!!\n\nSo don't let any of the Johnny-Come-Lately's on here (and there are \nsome, with responses that sound as tho they were licensed yesterday) \ncause any grief!!\n\nA good idea to start is with the THE RADIO AMATEUR'S SATELLITE \nHANDBOOK by Marty Davidson if you don't have it..\n\n\n> >From my POV, AO-7 is the most successful amateur satellite\n>ever made.  It's the energizer bunny of satellites, it has a large\n>footprint, and a long hang-time.  To top it off, it's easy to access\n>for someone with few financial and technical resources.\n>\n>I've seen a few comments about AO-40, but where is it?  Again,\n>from my POV, it's a proof of concept that needs to be followed\n>up with a working model.\n>\n>\n>To sum it up, I've spent most of my years in ham radio on HF.  I\n>like the idea of being able to contact people in foreign countries.\n\nMe too, and I've talked to over a hundred on the satellites!\n\nA lot of us understand your dilemma.  AO40 and other high altitude \nsats enabled worldwide communications with enough bandwidth, that \nI've never heard of anyone being able to get on...Some times sounded \nlike 20 meters at sunspot high, but that's the fun of ham \nradio....Most of those have deserted the reflector because of a lot \nof the crud that is on here, but just hold on until P3D is launched!!!\n\nGoogle Peter Guelzow DB2OS, and it will tell a bunch about P3D.\n\nBut I am interested in ham progress to the moon, mars, and anything \nelse that can be dreamed up, but I want any small contribution that I \nhave or might make to got to development of a high orbit satellite, \nand not some dumb 2 user FM bird.  (That we have circling us now!)\n\nOK, there's my oar, it's been bent before so go ahead!!\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n            73, Dave [email protected]\n                    Disagree: I learn....\n\n               Pulling for P3E... \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}