Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DUY3JGVOQSHZGRCQJWQQWB2NGJC36UUF/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "DUY3JGVOQSHZGRCQJWQQWB2NGJC36UUF",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/DUY3JGVOQSHZGRCQJWQQWB2NGJC36UUF/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k5oe (a) aol.com",
        "mailman_id": "aee3209b1433498d8db2ef6ec0d414c3",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/aee3209b1433498d8db2ef6ec0d414c3/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "K5OE",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: VUCC, grids, and a new QTH",
    "date": "2011-04-25T16:50:10Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DK76QUOHLVHHSYBMMV76O4NHQOWEN7UI/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nZack,\nOther things to consider before moving to CO:\n- your WAS award will only count for contacts made from OH\n- your DXCC award will count from anywhere in the lower USA\n- your WAC award will count from anywhere in N.A.\n- your WAP award will count from anywhere on Earth\n\n73,\nJerry, K5OE\n\n\n--- original message ---\nHi Patrick,\n\nYour response does confirm what I thought the answer was.  I guess the only \nthing I am wondering now is, if I move to SC, would it be acceptable to say \nI have 500 grids confirmed, or should I say 0?  VUCC is one aspect of it, \nbut how about the day to day grid collecting.  Since it would not be counted \ntowards an award, I do not see an issue with that, as long as you keep track \nof what grids were working in OH and which ones were worked in SC.\n\nI also know it is 200km - I was confusing it with 124mi.  ;-)\n\nBTW, I am not considering moving to SC (no offense to SC residents).  If I \nhad to move somewhere other than OH it would be CO.\n\nThanks for the response!\n\nZack\nKD8KSN\n\n-----Original Message----- \nFrom: Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)\nSent: Monday, April 25, 2011 12:08 PM\nTo: [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC, grids, and a new QTH\n\nHi Zack!\n\n> I have an “out of the blue” question that hit me the other day since I am\n> a freshmen in college and will likely move away from home sometime in\n> the next 5+ years...  I know the VUCC rules say you can count any grid\n> towards VUCC that was worked from two locations no more than 120km\n> apart.\n\nActually, the limit for the maximum distance between the locations you use\nfor satellite VUCC is 200km, or approximately 124.2 miles.  See section 6\nin the current VUCC rules at:\n\nhttp://www.arrl.org/files/file/Awards/VUCC%20Rules%202011_Rev%2020110215.pdf\n\n>  Lets say I have 500 grids worked by the time I move out (which is a LOT\n> of time, work and $$), and I decide to move to SC.  Are those 500 grids\n> that I worked/confirmed no longer valid towards VUCC (if I wanted to get\n> an endorsement)?\n\nIf your location in South Carolina is more than 200km from all locations\nyou are currently operating from and using toward your current satellite\nVUCC, then the South Carolina location could not be used toward your\nexisting satellite VUCC.  You would have to start working on a new satellite\nVUCC based on your new location in South Carolina.  You would still maintain\nyour existing satellite VUCC award, and could add to it if you operate from\nother locations that would fall within the 200km limit for that\nsatellite VUCC.\n\nThis probably isn't the answer you were looking for, Zack.  Then again, you\nwould have a new challenge to work stations from a new location further\neast than you are now.\n\n73!\n\n\n\n\nPatrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\nhttp://www.wd9ewk.net/\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}